Are there any verses that seem to use poetic devices within this book, or is it meant to be taken at face value?
More importantly, does it's interpretation make or break the rest of Scripture?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOPsvOWW9H0
>>1754861
If you don't have a literal lapsus you have destroyed the New Testament
Everything before Abraham is mythical stuff, Abraham on is mostly meant to be literal
>book that is supposed to be the ultimate source of truth
>first chapter is completely wrong
>>1754861
dude metaphors lmao
>>1754861
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQI72THyO5I
If this guy's interpretation is correct, then the answer is: both.
Adam is humanity, but he's also represent the individual who wish to dictate morality for himself, and life(Eve) become corrupted along with that decision.
is he right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utvFJ0v6-iU
Or just a senile old man?
>>1755771
Not wrong. Just different.
>>1754861
I take a literal view with the caveat that since the bible was inspired by God, there's always more layers than one might think.
>>1755018
Then there is no Abraham.
>>1755792
Dude, not watching a 30 min. video. Ask a question, get an answer.