>Ferdinand and Isabel did nothing wrong Agreed?

literally who cares

>>1753512

Jews, immigrants, the leftist parties, Franco's ghost and the Vatican.

>>1753506
>removing kebab and merchant

They did it all right.

Removing merchants was arguably a mistake

>>1753512
This is a history board you retard. Of course we care

>>1753506
Agreed until them sold their child to that french treacherous Hasburg

>>1753506

No objections.

>>1753506
From a pragmatic point of view that supports any action to secure and maintain power while also improving your nation as a whole? Yeah, they did pretty great. Isabelle could have done a bit better in making her opinion of Native Americans in Central and South America being simple people who had a right to be civilized (not made into slaves), Christianized, and treated as normal people, but overall, she and Ferdinand were quite successful in ensuring a monoreligious and cultural (basically saying no to any more Muslim influence) society that prospered during the first phase of the colonization of the New World.

From the point of view off anyone who got shafted by their policies or few mistakes? Yeah, they're pretty shitty.

>>1753530
Modern Vatican would be pissed, but during their time, they were given much praise by the Papacy, which is why they're called the Catholic Monarchs. They finally brought Granada under Christian rule and teachings after centuries of wars between Christian and Muslim kingdoms, and they also began the Christianizing of Native Americans.

>>1753506
>Papalism
no

>>1754615
>who had a right to be civilized (not made into slaves), Christianized, and treated as normal people

I know she did that for the natives in the Canary Islands. I remember reading one of her letters ordering her men to not take slaves.