Let's play a game /his/
Say one good and one bad thing about historical personality posted above yours.
I'll start.
>>1746840
>good
all around badass. Got knocked down and kept kicking ass
>bad
got killed by a frog
>>1746848
>good
Kept his shit together and wasn't afraid to risk it all for victory.
>bad
Let Hamilton manipulate him.
>>1746851
But Buddha is fictional figure.
>>1747124
it is a title, anon
when it is capital b with no name it is the gautama buddha
>>1747124
Siddhartha was real you mong
>>1747124
You are pretty fucking lowbrow.
>>1746851
>good
Philosophy which brought inner peace to a lot of people
>bad
Was kind of a dick before he was the Buddha
>>1747300
>good
Peace with Britain
>bad
Sedition act
>>1747318
>good
Fought the nazis
>bad
PM'd an illegal government
>>1747124
*tips conical hat
>>1749662
Supreme Court is pretty neat, and he did a lot of good for slaves in America
Idk alot about him to list some cons
>>1749753
THERE ARE NO CONS
>>1749764
I know you're just meming but
>good
reformed the Ottoman state into a cultured empire, supported the arts, allowed Orthodox to continue worship
>bad
romaboo, also could have handled Wallachia (and the Balkans in general) better
>>1749762
Calm down. He was by far the best Chief Justice we've had, but he should have been more forceful in making sure his rulings were enforced, especially with Jackson.
>>1750375
forgot picture
>>1750380
>good
manipulative and shrewd dickhead which I guess is a good thing
>bad
contradicts self alot. also possible satire lol