So to speak

File: 1474516695959.jpg (55KB, 927x712px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 927x712px

>>1739034
So essentially he is talking about a more tribal society before government, only there's no real leadership since it's lolbertarianism.
What exactly occurs if someone decides to fuck the NAP, build a great tribe with strong leadership and roll over all the weaklings?

old senile faggots would need to be removed also

>Libertarianism is so fragile that anyone who expresses a dissenting opinion will lead to the breakdown of society
kek

>>1739284
The abandonment of strong, constructive values for hypergamous hedonism does tend to degenerate societies though. He's essentially advocating for the role of religion to be taken up by the people and enforced for the sake of maintaining society, instead of whatever lofty goal religions use to control the population.

>>1739284
Bit like communism aye

>>1739284
He actually says that mete ostracism can be enough to dissuade degenerates and other threats to private property from acting out on their anti human beliefs. The physical removal part only comes when these people become such a nuisance that private property owners are more than encouraged to banish them from civilization.

>>1739034
Why is this on /his/?

>>1739284

That's the number one way to identify weak ideologies

>In the September 1988 issue of Liberty,[17] Hoppe attempted to establish an a priori and value-neutral justification for libertarian ethics by devising a new theory which he named argumentation ethics.[18] Hoppe asserts that any argument which in any respect purports to contradict libertarian principles is logically incoherent.
>yfw Libertarians have their own version of Wahhabism

It should be called Wahoppism

Hans Hoppe is a random meme not a libertarian

>>1739259

something something, freedom loving deathsquads to enforce the NAP etc etc etc

ANCAP IS FREEDOM

>>1740796
How is he not libertarian? He is the greatest defender of private property rights since Rothbard. If you pay a close attention to the quote, he only says physical removal of homossexuals, hedonists, etc. are only logical if one seeks to maintain a family-centered and kin-oriented private property community.

>>1739034
But I thought libertarians hated social contracts?

>>1739259
The problem with anarchists and libertarian types is that they don't get that humans are a species that live in groups to survive. Any group needs rules that govern interactions to function and thus survive, and those rules can only exist if there is some ability to enforce them. Any population size that exceeds the ability for everyone to know everyone else personally, and thus operate using simple social pressures, must create a codified impersonal system of rules to be administered consistently. This of course necessitates an authority ,whether democratic or authoritarian, to decide upon and enforce those rules and WHOOPS! you have a government. Libertarians, Communists, and Anarchists wanting to get rid of government and states are like Ant's going without a colony or Bee's without a hive. You can't get rid of states without getting rid of humans because states whether democratic or tyrannical are an integral part of humanity.

>>1740814
We hate the phony """implicit""" social """contract""" that apparently justifies the State, not explicit contracts agreed between private entities.

File: mODYc3m.png (137KB, 1159x618px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1159x618px

>>1740801

>ancap