Given the recent shitposting spree by some /pol/lack I might as well use the opportunity to get a thread going about Nazism. A few questions to /pol/ enthusiasts and history buffs.
Why do some neo-Nazis (I'll use use this as an umbrella term for all of you edgelords) try to sell the idea that Hitler wasn't racist and Nazi Germany wasn't all that bad to non-German folk? It's well documented how they treated Jews, Gypsies, Poles, Russians and Slavs in general. They sometimes post pic related which makes no sense. It's like saying America wasn't racist in the late 19th century because there were visions with black troops.
And how do you reconcile White Supremacy (admittedly it's mostly Americans) with lack of solidarity of Europeans between themselves? It's like niggers identifying as "black" in America, but in Africa they'd tear each other apart because of a funny accent.
And how on earth do you live with the daily cognitive dissonance of crying about "Jewish supremacy" (I'm looking at you, particular shitposter) and how unjust it is, yet being completely fine with the idea of subjugating and eradicating other races? Likewise, you endlessly whine about nigger behavior yet glorify violence.
>haha kristallnacht was so cool! destroying and looting small businesses and synagogues is awesome
>>1732815
divisions with blacks*
>Why do some neo-Nazis (I'll use use this as an umbrella term for all of you edgelords) try to sell the idea that Hitler wasn't racist and Nazi Germany wasn't all that bad to non-German folk?
People like to sanitize Hitler's beliefs so they have less cognitive dissonance to deal with. See homos that support Hitler's ideas about "da j00s" even though they would've been shot under his regime. That or they genuinely believe he was a good boy who dindu nuffin.
Never been able to figure that one out myself, and I hate jews as well. Wish he woulda done the job right. But yea, never understood how one can be an anti-semite, who loves hitler for his racial policies, but try to debunk the holocaust which is what you love about him in the first place.
Because Hitler was a retard that invented terms like "nordic-aryan" or "eastern-aryan" and would actually give persians, k*rds and other iranian people immunity towards the racial Nuremberg laws cause "muh pure-blooded aryans". Out of that a certain group of inferior people on another board got the idea that he was for other races cause of that and the alleged "all races should stay within their designated nations but fight together when needed" rhetoric.
They even planned a expedition to find the "roots of the aryan race" starting in the shithole of Iran and try uncover the meaning of the Beshitun inscription but it got called off after obviously they realized how retarded the idea was.
However, for the righteous House Osman and the alliance there it was an entirely other thing.
As Hitler himself understood the racial superiourity of the Turkic race and some stories say that he was a closet-Tengriist.
>>1732869
quality post itt
and yes, fuck jews.
>>1732815
>Given the little bits of deer shit we've all been spotting around the yard, I might as well use the opportunity to take a dump on the front doormat
>>1732881
I wanted to make this thread regardless, it genuinely interests me how do these people deal with the contradictions.
>>1732871
>and would actually give persians, k*rds and other iranian people immunity towards the racial Nuremberg laws cause "muh pure-blooded aryans".
No, the explanatory notes on the Aryan certificate explicitely stated that the term Aryan isn't to be understood in the linguistic sense, that means that non-white speakers of Indo-European languages weren't considered Aryans.
>le libshit meme virtue signalling buzzword ad hom generalizations
haha luls totes not biased at all xDD
kys revleftypol shitlibolshevist
>>1732924
So can we get a proper idea of how exactly each ethnicity was treated under Nazi rule?
Japs are honorary Aryans, yes? Were they treated well on the continent?
How about Indo-Aryans? Did they have any recognition as ostensible descendants of some "master race", or were they treated as Gypsies were?
If not, which ethnic groups precisely from South Asia were oppressed, and which were honored?
Were all people of Africab descent culled? How about Arabs? Non-Slavic, non-Germanic Europeans living under the Reich?
>>1732968
>revleftypol shitlibolshevist
I'm none of those.
Your kind uses all of those buzzwords, I'm speaking in your terms.
also what ad homs? and generalizations? if it doesn't apply to you then it wasn't directed to you.
>>1732977
Indus-aryans were actually treated very well.
I'll make a thread about it later.
Daily reminder that national syndicalism and fascism are inherently better than national socialism