To teach ethics, should you be required to also be as ethical a person as possible? E.g. being a vegan, volunteering, giving to charity, etc. Basically, should the teacher be better than all his students in behaving ethically?
But wouldn't that standard be really high? What if it means that fewer people teach ethics, which means that fewer people learn about ethics and modify their behavior? You don't have to be vegan to convert a few students to veganism.
I don't know where to stand on the issue.
>contemplating wheather or not an specific action is virtuous and not what are the virtues
You're already an unethical being for doing so.
It is in your nature to be ethical.
> E.g. being a vegan, volunteering, giving to charity, etc.
Are those acts ethical?
Who can determine why or why not?
>>1729564
Any ethical system that declares its own logic unethical can be rejected prima donna.
>>1729576
What apart of the ethical system am I deeming unethical?
Let's find the delliniation of the question
>Is it ethical to kill my sister?
This would show your nature of being unethical.
>>1729584
By what system have you preestablished what is ethical? If all ethics were intuitive and consistent among all persons, there would be no need for a formal analysis.
>>1729588
I cannot disagree with Hitler dubs.
Would you concede it is not an ethical contemplation to ask
>is it ethical to kill my sister?
as in
>would it be in line with the Virtues?
>>1729584
Maybe if your sister is evil she will commit horrible acts if you don't kill her.
>>1729596
Maybe if.
But I cannot know such things.
>What if the man on the left track is Hitler?
>>1729538
Teaching ethics is just sophistry and ideology t b h.