What's your take on it?
>>1716687
What chu talkin about? They had some outside donors.
>>1716687
>What's your take on it?
Did you paint over Eve's nipples?
>>1716687
Gotta keep that jew blood free of goy anon.
I mean, if everyone else is gone, what else are you gonna do? You're gonna have to take one for the team here and do your mom/sister/whatever for the future of humanity.
>>1716687
they was black.
>>1716794
I cannot in good conscience fill the world with a bunch of my retarded incest ass babies because God threw a tizzy and decided to kill everybody.
>>1716839
But what if your sister's hot?
>>1716687
Good topic, however...
>love atheism
>>>/r/atheism
Take off your reddit stench first.
>>1716839
Incest only becomes a problem in the realm of birth defects with repeated incest throughout generations.
If you fuck your sis the baby will be by all accounts normal.
If you fuck your sis again and end up with a boy and a girl and they fuck each other and have kids that's where issues start becoming more prevalent.
>>1716892
OP here
Not an atheist, did pic related trigger you? Anyway just curious, that Christians (and Muslims, as well as some Jews) don't even wonder/question or trying to understand this topic.
>>1716913
Though i have to admit most Christians i know just said it's an allegory or other symbolic story.
It's quite weird still, since incest is generally frowned upon by modern Christians and other semitic religion.
>>1716913
You're ignorant. Most every Christian, and likely Jews, have pondered this and come up with explanations.
Including but not limited to
>Adam and Eve had all the genetic diversity humans were capable of therefore incest wasn't an issue
>God made more people
>Angels
If you ever ponder something that seems incredibly base and wonder why no one else has ever pondered it, the actual reason is because you didn't take the time to look at all the ways this obvious conundrum has been pondered before.
I like the Bible because it triggers people I don't like. Kind of like if you threw holy water on the devil.
>>1716900
Could that produce Homo Erectus?
>>1716929
>Already think of the second
>First one was interesting
Third one was something new though. They did mention some things about "Sons of God" in Genesis, is that about it?
>>1716932
Holy water is just water though.
>>1716929
Like this?
>>1716954
Basically yeah
>>1716957
And this?
>>1716971
>>1716954
The irony is that Creationtards scoff at the idea of all the diversity of life coming from one common ancestor but the rate of genetic change their own "theory" requires is orders of magnitude greater than anything a scientist would accept as possible.
>>1716981
Just look at this ark "kind" that was used in the Ark Encounter. Somehow this medium-sized (?) cat gave rise to everything from a housecat to a lion in less than 4000 years.
>>1716995
I would like to point out humans have created a fuckton of different dog breeds out of wolves. Chiwawas and Saint Bernards are both descended from a wolf. Although wolves are bigger than both.
>>1717005
Actually now that I say that, are chiwawas from wolves or from some other canine breed indirectly related to wolves?
>>1717007
All dog breeds are descended from a relative of the Indian wolf, the Ameriwolf's smaller cousin. Should also note that most of the breeding was directed rather than naturally chosen, and that dogs have more variability due to having a more generalized ancestor, while cats are more adapted to the niche of apex predator.
>>1716787
Ancient Egyptians also did this. Blood purity is serious matter for these peoples
>>1716794
Lot's daughters have the same thought...
Actually, these stories are from the Torah. Jews believe that shit.
Nice try Schlomo
>>1716687
Typical of the creepy ancients that wrote this shit in the first place.