Did the wrong people win WW1?

>implying winners

Gabrilo looks so dreamy and handsome.

>>1700787
The right people won. They just didn't crush Germany hard enough.

WW1 bolstered nationalist sentiment everywhere allowing for many new nations to arise, colonials threw off the shackles of their European overlords.

If anything it was the common man that won WW1, the aristocracy was knocked down a few pegs or entirely wiped out. Whether it was fascism, socialism or solidifying democracy, it was clear that your fellow man was more respectable than your superiors.

>>1700817
He looks pretty depressed and distraught to me. He just seems so sad and troubled in this picture.

>>1700832
and then it quickly went back to a much stronger aristocracy with a much wider grip on far more common people

>>1700787

To be honest everyone lost WW1 including the British.

The British technically won the aftermath in WW2 but they lost all their colonies so they ended up a shit nation.

I suppose the USA won out in the end, but thats still up for debate.

>>1700827
This

>>1700827
t.angry Polack

I don't care as long as Austrians die

File: frenchman.jpg (29KB, 298x400px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 298x400px

>>1700827
t. butthurt frenchie

>>1700817
He looks like a squirrelly loser

>>1700827
I agree. If the allies had been much harsher on germoney, then they would of never recovered and would remain a backwater shithole to this day.

>>1700787

Yes

Without a shadow of a doubt yes

Our world would be near Utopian if Germany won that war

>>1700787
It should have never started in the first place.

>all that shilling for war pre-WW1
>oh war is so noble, wouldn't it be grand if we had a world war
>THE WAR TO END ALL WARS

Fucking disgusting in hindsight

>>1704120
Care to elaborate?

File: 1459898223544.png (1MB, 1000x776px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x776px

>>1700827
/thread

>Did the wrong people win WW1?

What does this even mean?

>>1704487
Pretty straight forward question. The side that won WW1, were they the ones that should have won, or was their side the one that had the most positive impact?

Austria-Hungary lost and that's all that matters. I wouldn't want to live in a world where Habsburgs ruled half of Europe.

>>1700817
he was dying of disease you faggot

>>1700812
yes

>>1704566
>implying losers other than Germany

>>1704566
>should have won
That's not how it works. There are winners and losers. Crying about a "wrong" side is just butthurt.

>>1704684
Perhaps I explained it not too well. Imby should have won, I mean those who would have had a better impact on the world. So if Germans winning really would have meant a better world today, they should have won.

>>1700827
this.

>>1704691
>better impact on the world
What do you even base that on? It's purely hypothetical and given to bias.