>Soviet thread >Robert Conquest or Grover Furr cited

>>1687385
[COLLAPSE]

>>1687385
Have you ever read any of Conquest's poetry, OP?

Into one’s ninetieth year.
Memory? Yes, but the sheer
Seethe as the half-woken brain’s
Great gray search-engine gains
Traction on all one’s dreamt, seen, felt, read,
Loathed, loved…
. . And on one’s dead.
-Which makes one’s World, one’s Age, appear
Faint wrinkles on the biosphere
Itself the merest speck in some
Corner of the continuum.

>>1687393
Wow that's garbage

What's wrong with Conquest?

>>1687622
Communists seem to hate him for some reason. Here's some Australian Maoist fag excited at his death. Be warned: The comment section if extra cancerous.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-VEudI883BQ

>>1687622
IIRC he got revealed as a propagandist working with for the British, and he is also where the "eleventy gorrilian russians" thing comes from.

>>1687670
who the fuck is this guy?

>>1688032
>Jason Unruhe

Among leftists, he's a living meme. His very existence is a bad joke, and people only watch him to laugh at him.

>>1688032
He's some Canadian neckbeard who says he's an adherent of Maoism and constantly tries to revise history. Imagine Varg Vikernes but communist and a 100 times more cringe worthy.

>>1687389
One L too many

>>1687622
Basically Cold War propaganda. Little less biased than Furr, but fabricated gulag death counts in the upper millions based on literally no evidence.

The Black Book of Communism was based on his now-disproven bodycount.

>>1687670
Haha not even Maoists take JU seriously

>>1687385
>Robert Conquest or Grover Furr cited

Mark my words - they'll be vindicated when the Soviets open up the double secret archives.

http://web.archive.org/web/20080611064213/http:/www.etext.org/Politics/Staljin/Staljin/articles/AHR/AHR.html