If you could reverse the result of any war in history, which

I'd probably make the Scandis win in 1066 to see what would happen if the UK was Nordic rather than Norman.

The war on Whites.

File: tsar.jpg (498KB, 722x727px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 722x727px

>>1687313
Same for me, anon.

>>1687321
it isn't over yet

>>1687313
30 years war, nation states were a mistake.

French revolution
I wish I could keep the technology it brought humanity tho

Rhodesian War

>>1687313
Napoleonic wars

>>1687313
Northern Wars, if I had to choose one, then I'd go with the first one.

American civil war

>>1687566
You mean War of Secession. Also /thread

>>1687566
/thread

>>1687566
I /thread'd this but I'd also not mind if allied victory in europe/china was reversed. kmt/japan keeping china wouldn't have been bad, and pax america has failed.

>>1687566
This but also the Mexican-American war. Let Mexico keep Texas, California, etc.

>>1687707
Texas should be it's own republic

>>1687313
Franco-Prussian War

>>1687313
American invasion of Granada.

Granada conquering the US would have been great.

>>1687320
They would have lost to the numerous revolts that William faced after the conquest. Even if they had won I could see them dividing the inheritance and losing it again to a wittan they didn't remove again.

I feel like the only correct answer is ww1.

>>1687313
>great turkish war

inb4 kebab

>>1687754
Wrong, it's the Napoleonic wars.

>>1687501
the guilliotine?

The Great Northern War, Swedish superpower with Charles XII would have been great

>>1687313
If it counts, then the overall initial expansion and first war the Rashidun Caliphate had against the Byzantine Empire and Sassanid Empire.

>tfw no Zoroastrian and Christian Near East

>>1688351
Eh they'd find another reason to autistically kill each other, and this is coming from an Iranian

>>1688369
You do know the Byzantines and Sassanids had several periods of drawn out peace, mutual defensive alliances, and trade going on between themselves with each other right?

File: 1471566060519.png (531KB, 556x650px) Image search: [Google]

531KB, 556x650px

>>1688338
Good choice

>>1688436
france spent some time allied with the austrians
what's your point

The thing most damaging to European civilization would be the Punic Wars.

Imagine how butthurt the Romans would be.

>>1687713
This. They fought their own completely separate war for independence from Mexico.

>>1688436
And they had several periods of bloody violence. The Islamic world too had peaceful times, believe it or not

That entire area, just by virtue of being home to so many different ideologies and ethnicities, is volatile by nature

My own parents are still assblasted and hold a grudge against some angry Arab (Omar) from 1400 yrs ago

File: sherman3.jpg (55KB, 796x582px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 796x582px

>>1687566
what would you like most about that? The continuation of slavery or the economic ruin of the south?

The Spanish Flu epidemic

It ended.

Cuban Missile Crisis

>>1687313
Crimean war. The eastern question would have hopefully been solved then. Constantinople would hopefully be greek.

>>1688461
t. Arab
>>1688453
Except perform the 6th century, the Persians and Byzantines had over a century of stability between each other. There was no need to assume there was always going to be an ultimate war of annihilation between the two.

>>1687313
War of Northern Aggression.

>>1688732
Yeah one period of peace doesn't negate the perpetual conflict in literally every other year

For example, after that century they fought each other to the point that some randos from Arabia defeated the two most powerful (yet exasperated) empires of their time

Go to bed Byzantine/Sassanid Internet Defense Force

Taiping Rebellion

>>1687435
Fourth crusade

>>1687313
7 years war

>>1688752
>one period of peace
They had multiple periods of peace, you dong.

>>1687313
the franco spanish war of 1635

File: enree da fiff.jpg (2MB, 2400x3352px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2400x3352px

Hundred years war.
I wouldn't even change anything on the battlefield, I'd just give pic related 3 more months to live. That'd be it.

>>1687566
Why? Union winning allowed America to unite and turn into a great industrialist power. The South winning secession would mean the victory of the agrarian system, resulting in two lesser states one of them being a backwards shithole much like it happened with Argentina.

File: lenin.jpg (46KB, 649x854px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 649x854px

>>1687313
I guess a totalitarian absolute monarchy (one of the richest in the world) ruling a population that is over 80% illiterate, uneducated, 1st and 2nd generation freed enedenured servents who were perpetually abused and starving is preferabe to the 1st socialist state that rival the US in industrial power and world influence.

What kind of history buff would have one of the most interesting periods in history not exist?

>>1687313
Franco-Prussian War

>>1691402
>the ussr
>socialist
fuck off trotscum

File: work harder.jpg (200KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1920x1080px

>>1691412
The Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics

you fucking retard

File: AMERICA.jpg (10KB, 235x215px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 235x215px

I would stop 9/11

>>1691450
>le ebin soviet militarism XDDD
Come back after you've read some Marx and have the basics down. No, Trotsky is not "the basics".

>>1691512
0/10 troll
things never mentioned: soviet militarism, Marx, Trotsky, my opinions on communism

In order to illicit butthurt you actually have to engage something in their response

File: patriotism.png (80KB, 196x200px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 196x200px

>>1691501
Spoken like a true patriot