When and why did the man cease to be regarded as the head of

when people became too poor and now women need to work too to sustain a family, and welfare

When women started working jobs that allowed them to divorce their husbands.

Something tells me you're nursing a few theories yourself OP. Why don't you tell me?

Why to undermine western civilisation and destroy white homogeneity so that Communism could be enacted for the brown slave race of the future.

>>1676817
>brown slave race
That's racist. The zionists want every member of the goyim to serve them.

i'd go into detail op but i can tell you don't really care about social history and you're yet another faggot from /pol/ looking into history to validate his views.

you probably think everything was perfect in the 50's and say 'based' unironically

>>1676809
once he beat woman in arm wrestle

In a way, men were not "head of family". In some issues, women used to have more power than males.
Of course, in terms of large spending, men made the decisions, but usually the one that ran the family were the women.

>>1676902
Ran the house you mean.

>>1676814

I really don't, but in today's society it's hard to imagine a time when men were legally considered the head of a family and wives had to obey them. I mean French law recognized this as late as 1970.