Feminism
Discuss
>>1676325
It should actually be Votes for Everyone.
No one should vote
Just favoritism and special treatment at this point.
A bunch of male nerds spend most of their free time coding as teenagers then get high paying jobs and start businesses. This triggers the Stacies who made fun of them in high school so they cry sexism even though the root of the problem is attitudes among women. Normies have zero sentiment for adult males who are not alpha so they trip over each other to "defend" the damsels in "distress" and give them all the affirmative action, paid maternity leave and benefits they want.
Women were trying to get the vote, around the same time as WWI.
Young men were paying for their ability to vote with their lives and these morons want it just cuz. What did women do to earn a vote?
In the end I don't care about their suffrage. Whatever. Feminism has joined forces with the 'I need to be treated like a child my whole life' movement that's plaguing the world. Constantly trying to extend adolescence and flee any ugly head of responsibility.
Really only property owners should vote. Or more realistically, only those who pay more in taxes than they take. I'm so sick of people voting themselves other people's money.
Also of this is very tired ranting but tldr feminism has no regard for men's needs at all. They like to throw a few tokens in that they never really fight for. But in the end they really just don't give a shit. Just a bunch of selfish children.
>>1676364
Actually tldr
Entitlement. That's it. That's how you sum up feminism
>>1676337
Agreed
>>1676369
wow racist much
>>1676334
Only redeemable post itt
Out of the way ladies real woman coming through
>>1676364
What did the government do to earn taxation without representation?
>>1676364
Wowwwww.... you do know that it's 2016, right???? F off misogynerd
>>1676774
>women
>taxed
ITT: "I've been triggered by tumblrinas a few times so now I'm going to denounce even the mildest notion of gender equality under the law"
The problem with modern feminists is that they are very shallow.
They basically want to become Lindsay Lohan. It is all about money and sex.
>>1676325
It's a shame that it's been coopted by liberal identity politics, and few people bother to engage with critical feminist authors and their work. Any sort of meaningful discussion on the internet is nearly impossible because of the sheer lack of ignorance on the subject. I don't bother discussing things with people who haven't picked up a book on any relevant feminist authors (shaw, carby, judith, hooks, spivak). Since they usually having nothing interesting and new to say, no critiques of actual feminist theory. It's pointless.
>>1676325
Voters should be property owners.