The Roman empire was actually more detrimental to the future

>>1675454
unlike the celts and the germans, the romans actually had an effect on the future of europe

The Roman empire wasn't even Roman, but Africans

http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/sesostris-the-great-the-egyptian-hercules/were-the-ancient-romans-white-not-on-your-life-by-oguejiofo-annu/

take the redpill and open your eyes sheep

>>1675454
That's a logical fallacy

>>1675461
>unlike Celts and Germans

Romans raped and pilliaged everywhere they go, the notion that they created and helped create Europe is a myth that was perpetuated during the Renaissance, true students of history know that the "Romans" were the real barbarians

>stole greek architecture
>passed it off as their own
>stole Celt and Greek governing systems
>passed it off as their own

>>1675472
>take something
>improve upon it to its logical conclustion
>YOU STEALERS DON'T TAKE MUH CREDIT MUHFUGGA

>>1675462
WE

>>1675483
WUZ

>>1675454
>V A R U S
>A
>R
>U
>S

The Roman Republic should've lived. Julius Caesar was a mistake

>>1675491
KANGZ

>>1675496
>government with inefficient decision making
>in a continent spanning empire with communication and travel taking years
Is this a post?

>>1675499
N

>>1675516
Having a military made of land owning reservists made more sense for political stability, and it's cheaper.

File: 1387406355510.png (222KB, 406x382px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 406x382px

>>1675517
STERCUS