Is the NAP the greatest political/philosophical concept of our time?

Who's going to enforce it?

The only way NAP can be achieved is to make an aggression to be deadly for aggressor and even in that case, you just switch to micro-aggression as it wouldn't be banned.

File: 735f3d037628490fd435e5ba27909eb8.jpg (115KB, 720x638px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 720x638px

No, God is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3_FQ_blPYY

No, it is an oversimplification in a world where most countries are ostensibly democratic yet corruption is still rife because voters have an oversimplified view of politics and can't see who the real enemies are.

Anarcho-capitalism is just as dogmatic and lacking in plurality as the other ideologies it criticizes. You can be right about 1 thing, but that doesn't mean it holds precedent over other equally valid ideas.

>>1658337
>individual owns his labor

Further proof that lolbertarians are crypto communists

>>1658337
No its completely unworkable.

and I say that as a libertarian

>>1658337
It is probably the spookiest concept ever created

File: 5443273e696688d5.png (27KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 500x500px

>>1658451
This

>>1658337
mongoloid idiocy. Just like most anarchist ideologies tbqh

>>1658471
This.

>everything is a spook/disctraction except this horseshit moral axiom I adhere to