Classical/Literary Chinese thread

>>1651556
破四旧!

没有共产党就没有新中国。

>>1651837
｢破四舊｣非白話也。白話而像｢打破四個舊的｣。

>>1651837
>>1652874
>10cent party

>>1651556
I've been studying CC over the summer. Tell me if this can be right or not.
臣分大學之教於百姓者順禮命也
"The minister who distributes the Great Learning's instructions to the masses/people obeys ritual and fate.

File: 7cphall2.jpg (47KB, 450x194px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 450x194px

>>1651837
For a "revolutionary", Mao sure did have a lot of attachment with "the Four Olds".

>>1653091
I'm not sure if using 者 like that with 臣 at the front is right; not sure if it's wrong either, though. I think you could also say something like 分大學之教於百姓之臣.

>>1653307
According to my handbook, it seems to be valid. The zhe is supposed to put emphasis on the minister.

How do i get into my chinese girlfriends pants

>>1653507
be a millionaire

Another question, in what circumstances, if any at all, are 餘 and 而 required in establishing a time? For example. in the sentence 其後四十四餘年而秦戰百越, I think both are totally unnecessary.
>>1653507
Eat dogs and destroy Japanese cars

>>1653578
Well, the nature of Classical Chinese is that practically anything can be omitted if the meaning is clear. Have a look at the 千字文 for example!