Is history just one big giant dick size contest?
>>1650220
Stormfags and Tankies sure make it that way.
>>1650220
One of the most retarded, simplistic pictures even seen.
Also Hitties in 2000 bc?
Why isn't there any mention that Assyrians colonized Eastern Anatolia building massive cities (for the time), one of which gave us 20,000 written tablets
Full chart
https://a.pomf.cat/vilfvy.jpg
>>1650224
Left libertarians and Stirnerites mock the shit out of it so I don't they they're any better than stormfags or tankies.
>>1650232
>>1650220
Also no Indus valley civilization in 2000 bc?
Aryans in India in 2000 bc?
What a load of bullshit
Also Iranians in 2000 bc?
Elamites were not Iranian
What the fuck.
Just a quick glance at this shit and it's a load of bullshit
Also Mongolians/huns?
Why the fuck would you include Mongolians as relevant in 2000 bc?
>>1650242
I don't think they're any better*, rather.
According to Nietzsche, history has no purpose. It is merely a series of events that have no meaning in and of themselves, other than subjective meanings adopted by individuals and human groups relative to their own time, place, and experiences.
>>1650220
Yes it is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qqARrbi1h8
why does the british empire take up such little space? wasn't it the largest empire in history?
>>1650386
they wasn't kangz
>>1650220
today you can group a lot of them by the like 15-20trillion+ gdp club
OIC red
CNY yellow
EU blue
CW green
USA purp
its a different story per capita but thats the game
there is also NATO - BRICS
& anglo saxon V (aus, nz, canada, uk, usa). africa seems to be dead game but u could also include sa, rip rhodesia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_Organisation_of_Islamic_Cooperation