Do we know anything about Neolithic civilizations that isn't

>>1622498
Yes that they built megaliths.

File: 51ABT97467L._SX325_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (38KB, 327x499px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 327x499px

>>1622498
Great reasonably current well narrated well sourced book on the subject.

Short answer: yes

>>1622498

Yes quite a lot, we've found their houses, we've found their trash pits, we've found their fields and their domesticated animals, we've found their tools and weapons. Only a couple of neolithic societies had writing so we'll never know lots of stuff about them, but we certainly know a great deal more than you might initially think possible.

File: 1470505179784.jpg (211KB, 1024x1259px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1024x1259px

>>1622498
Yes, of course anon. They were just primitive hunter-gatherers who just happened to build huge stone monuments and underground shelters.
Nothing else.

>>1622857
WE

>>1622891
WUZ

there could have been anything up to a pre industrial civilization, before the last glacial period., and we would never know.

Get ready lads

Schizophrenic self serving speculative theories inbound

>>1623072

Nonsense, we've found plenty of paleolithic sites from before the last ice age all over the world, zero trace of anything other than palaeolithic technology has been found.

>>1623054
ADVANCED

>>1623072
>and we would never know
Bullshit

We know dinosaurs were a thing and what's more were actually birds regardless of original perception but determining the rough technological level, if any, of some make believe civilization 20000 years ago?

>nah man
> impossible

Fuck you.

>>1623079
Glaciers tend to destroy things, especially when they cover a huge part of a continent for millennia.
Erosion and flooding of the lowlands (see Doggerland) take care of the rest.

>>1623072
How many Stonehenge monuments have been made by modern architects? Big fucking rocks placed together in a pattern are not the signs of an advanced civilization
>inb4 advanced rock polymer-based technology

>>1623095
and yet we have a strong record of stone tools that gradually get more advanced. what use does an advanced civilization have for better methods of producing flint spears and knives?

>>1623095
But would glaciers selectively destroy only the highest technology around?

We've found stone age tech from that period. We haven't found anything else.

>>1623116
What about chinese pipes and other out of place artifacts "academia" ignores.

>>1623180
Such as?
Genuinely interested.

>>1623194
Dorchester pot

Iron man
Pillar of Delhi
Kingoodie artifact
Lake Winnipesaukee mystery stone

>>1623194
baigong pipes

>>1623194
London hammer

File: stonehenge-circle-pink-sky.jpg (124KB, 1440x612px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1440x612px

>5000 years and STILL no explanation

>>1623256
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pCvx5gSnfW4

Exact words of my brother in law when exposed to this video for the first time:

> man fuck this guy
> stupid asshole is going around doing it the hard way
> Ancient people used elector magnetic beams

He's a conspiracy theorist, ancient alien adherent, atheist, sovereign citizen and a nigger.

Sis sure knows how to pick'em.

>>1623306

>This chubby son of a bitch in michigan is making ancient alien monoliths and basically your fucking stupid
>Click here to find out how

Man, i get jealous as fuck.

Same thing happened when I heard the greek navy was making a 1:1 replica trireme.

>>1623341
Having a hard time deciphering your post anon, care to clarify?

>>1623180
>"academia" ignores
>there's literally a wiki page full of citations to academic investigation of said pipes

>>1623341
>Same thing happened when I heard the greek navy was making a 1:1 replica trireme
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4P3P8Ejvps

>>1623180
this, the "academia" is collaborating with the lizardfolk guys, it's the only logical reason why they'd keep this covered

>>1623389
Ebin joke/false-flag, my friend.

>>1623406
well, why would they keep it covered then?

>>1623411
Well, maybe not necessarily an "evil conspiracy", but more like reluctance to give much attention to things they can't explain.

>>1623234
>Dorchester pot
>Clearly Victorian workmanship

>Pillar of Delhi
>Made with common knowledge metalworking

>Kingoodie artifact
>No pictures, no documentation, no evidence it's not some 19th century hoax

>Mystery stone
>Has marks from where it was made from power tools

No idea what the fuck you mean by iron man.

I fucking love out of place artifacts, but c'mon, at least post stuff that isn't creationist bullshit.

>>1623472
But these "weird" things usually get loads of attention, "ANCIENT ALIEN EGYPTIAN LIGHTBULBS" stand out so much more compared to "mycenian oil jar #3463"

>>1623479
>Has marks from where it was made from power tools
Yeah man that's the problem.