https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gPrBbXykwM
Is he right? Also is the Moghul plate armour the reason they conquered India?
>>1618356
>Is he right?
>beigeman
Lol
>>1618356
Holy shit stop posting these.
I think you're just trying to trick us into watching his videos, which is working on me.
He literally never makes that claim in the video.
>>1618356
>Is he right?
About what?
That vid is just him showing off some antique armour he bought.
jesus christ, i want chain mail now
does anybody know a good manufacturer that sells medieval style tunics and chainmail?
>Moghul
>Not writing it Mughal
Kys
>>1618356
Make it stop.
>>1618602
Lindybeigetrousers tries to be Bong as fuck to satisfy what little pride he has for himself.
I bet Mumbai is still "Bombay" for him, spells Arab names like "Ayyub" as "Ayoob," and uses Wade-Giles for the romanization of Chinese languages.
>>1618625
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gPrBbXykwM&feature=youtu.be&t=15m27s
>>1618585
If you're in the UK then The Knight Shop do some pretty decent reproductions. They do some pretty crap ones as well, generally the more expensive the better the quality.
Matt Easton > Lindy Beigeman
>>1618842
Also he would totally kick his ass in a real melee.
>>1618842
Skallagrim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lindybeige >> Matt Easton
>>1618865
Kek. Skallagrim is a cringe neckbeard. Lindy kind of sucks too because he bases most of his shit on experience larping and goes full bong. Easton is the only one that seems relatively normal and well-adjusted and knowledgeable.
>>1618602
FUCK OFF YANK
>cringe neckbeard
>>1618356
>>1618865
>>1618356
Do you screencap these threads you make and send them to him?
>>1623131
By showmanship do you mean being a smug cunt who gets offended when anyone disagrees with him?
>>1618625
>not calling Arabia Araby
>not calling China Cathay
>>1623131
>showman ship
Fuck off back to the History Channel or wherever you came from.
>>1623131
He seems pretty sympathetic and reasonable and gives slack to films&tv for having to be entertaining while maintaining a consisten (but non-autistic) criticism of common historical misconceptions.