Why do some people deny that Germany caused WW1?

Because it makes it easier for them to treat Hitler as an anomaly rather than a logical extension of Germany national desires.

Germany is the original dindu
BF1 was right to depict them as black after all

Oh wow, another german hate thread

>>1611408
another german hate thread among people who actually know about history
really makes you think.
G*rms are the ultimate niggers

>>1611472
>/his/
>knows history
This board is a bunch of pop history morons, don't kid yourself.

>>1611472
Any crimes committed by the germans were done tenfold by the british empire and their children.
Also claiming that you actually know about history on the 4chins doesn't really confirm that you know about history

File: 1469601830573.png (219KB, 854x1024px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 854x1024px

>implying it wasn't Austria's fault
>implying Austria isn't entirely responsible for BOTH of the world wars

>>1611164
Everybody caused ww1. Everyone involved wanted it to happen

>>1611498
Why do you continue to spout this meme despite having the proof it's not true?
How brainwashed can one be?

>>1611511
>pretending that french revanchism didn't exist
How perfidious can you get?

>>1611493
This desu. Its like the cheeky cunt little brother whos always getting big brother into fights and trouble that he cant get out of.
>>1611511
Not an argument. literally an are you kidding me tier post

>>1611488

Britain violated belgian neutrality? Ten times at that?

I love /his/ its such a font of learning.

>>1611511
t. anglo

>>1611522
No one pretends that
But fact is that it didnt matter in the end cause Germany started the war and not France

It's like saying both Japan and the US are responsible for Pearl Harbor because US politicians didnt like Japan

>>1611527
How is this one act even relevant? This is literally nothing compared to the genecide and subjugation commited by the brits.

>it's a contrarian contradicts a major branch of contrarianism episode

>commonboredpepe.jpg

>>1611544
>how is an unprovoked DOW, shoting of civilians and rape even relevant?


wew there kameraden

>>1611543
The fact is that the Frogs were hoping that the germs mobilize, because they could get their plan XVII on.

Then when the English weren't sure about getting in the war they got extremely butthurt because it would mean they would be fighting a defensive, not offensive war

>>1611544
>How is this one act even relevant lmao
>How is Casus Belli even relevent lmao

t. Von Bethmen-Hollweg

File: 1468201803098.jpg (659KB, 1496x2044px) Image search: [Google]

659KB, 1496x2044px

Let's get this shit started

>>1611561
Nice headcanon
But the truth is that France tried to avoid the war by:

1. Removing their troops 10kms from the border
2. Not reacting when Germany attacked Russia
3. Not reacting when Germany invaded Luxembourg

But all that for nothing, since upon seeing that their provokation hadnt successfully made France join the war, the Germans decided to involve France themselves by directly attacking it
Their was no way France could have gotten out of this

>>1611572
This doesnt fit my "Germany is innocent" argument therefore I refuse to aknowledge this

>>1611572

Who was the guy that convinced Nicolas II that Russia was the protector of the slavs and they should protect the balkanshits? Was that Sazonov?

Cause otherwise this is a perfect list and no amount of german dinduism will change that.

>>1611572
say what you want but those mutes could pack some decent moustache

>>1611596
What is there to acknowledge? Its a just a generic "things that I like at the top and things that I dont like at the bottom" image

>>1611164

Because the story is a bit more complex than the picture you posted. There are better arguments to prove German responsibility, but then you'd have to invest a certain amount of time to properly study the topic. However, you seem to prefer spamming the same pic over and ove again that is meaningless without context.

http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/filename/wwdf/
http://desuarchive.org/_/search/filename/wwdf/

People like you should post less on /his/.

>>1611613
I knew it was the Eternal Frog!!!

>>1611583
>1. Removing their troops 10kms from the border
>2. Not reacting when Germany attacked Russia
>3. Not reacting when Germany invaded Luxembourg

Because they wanted Germany to make the first attack. France promised to join Russia in case of war with Germany. You're suggesting that France planned to stay out after the German declaration of war to Russia and had to be dragged in; that is wrong.

>>1611636
This.

On a related note, Czech were the agressors in ww2, they forced the germans to occupy the rest of czechia, retreating from the sudetenland was a clear act of agression.

>>1611643

>autism

not an argument

>>1611643
Poles share the blame too
They shouldnt have attacked that radio station

>>1611651
not to mention the Danes, their cow milk was an affront to national socialism, they had to be invaded

>>1611164
What this stupid wikipedia shit does not show is, who mobilized their armies first.
Of course Germany attacked first, just to not fight in Germany but France. Everything else would have been fucking retarded.

Simple example:
If I tell you a hundret times I will fucking kill you (France had one aim: destroy Germany) and reach for my gun that I open carry (mobilized first), what are you going to do? Wait for me to shoot or shoot first?

>>1611613
>French flag
why am i not surprised

>>1611699
>el famoso pre-emptive action

I guess Japan was right to attack the US first too

>>1611699
ayy lmao

It's not like Germany had a vast army mobilized to begin with (see quote) or that it had egged Austria on (see quote) or that they openly said they wanted war (see fucking quote).

No amount of dindu nuffin is going to change that Germany is to blame for turning a local war in the Balkans into the First World War.

>>1611717
No fucking idea what they did, but Germany did nothing wrong back then.
... at least not more than anyone else.

>>1611722
>Germany had a vast army mobilized to begin with
Who cares? France mobilized first. Nothing more to that.

>that it had egged Austria on
No idea what you mean by that.

>they openly said they wanted war
Like literally anyone else.

>>1611572
This list fails to mention the architect: Schlieffen, who drew up the German army's mobilization plan. I say plan because Germany literally had only one plan for mobilization, i.e. the Schlieffen Plan. There was no contingency plan for a one-front war. There was no plan for partial mobilization. There was no plan to not invade Belgium. The elder von Moltke had a plan for a limited 2-front war, defensive on the western front and allowing room for diplomatic flexibility.

>>1611732
>France mobilized first

Germany mobilized first
They mobilized in 1912

>>1611793
>They mobilized in 1912

Well, they probably had good Viagra to keep that boner for so long.

>>1611164
Because it was the fault of France and Russia for backing Serbian terrorists who were destabilising the periphery of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

>>1611774
>I say plan because Germany literally had only one plan for mobilization, i.e. the Schlieffen Plan. There was no contingency plan for a one-front war.
cool story, bro

Dundu niffin

>>1611717
>>1611727

This, the American dying at pear harbor was a clear act of agression towards the german reich, only natural way to proceed was to declare war.