What if the labor theory of value is wrong?

>>1608698
whats the common unit of work, joules? does electromagnetic brainwaves have a signal, a unit, is it dependant upon its area x reach?

>>1608698
So far I haven't seen any proof that it's correct

>>1608698
It's not.

>>1608708
Then you probably don't understand what it is talking about. Liberals need to stop trying to read Marx as though Marx is using liberal economic terms.

>>1608704
>whats the common unit of work, joules?
Capital.

>>1608711
Offer proof.

>liberal

Your mother is a liberal you cuck

>>1608698
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-autistic_economics

Try reading some and also start reading about why neoclassical economics is stupid bullshit.

Also yes that link is real.

>>1608713
Badum tish!~

>>1608716
What?

It's literally how capitalism works, laborers produce value, that value is alienated from them.

>>1608731
And where is the proof that this alienation is even a real tangible thing and not just some metaphysical pseudo Hegelian horseshit that exists only in your communist head?

>>1608713
t. statist

>>1608743
>I have no idea what I'm talking about so let me just throw out some words that make the other person sound bad

>>1608738
Because companies turn a profit to shareholders

>>1608761
Give me one single proof that an objective, quantifiable use value is even a thing.

>>1608768
>companies turn a profit that goes to shareholders

>>1608803
That's not an argument of use value existing.

File: Untitled.jpg (414KB, 1992x804px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 1992x804px

>>1608698
desu its only as strong a theory as the monetary supply is non fiat & the banks are non usuary, beyond that its not worth the pixel you printed it on
>t. wipes ass with pixels

>>1608750
t. butthurt egocentrism