>the mummy was approximately 9,400 years old — older than any previously known North American mummy
>Further study determined that the mummy exhibits Caucasoid characteristics resembling the Ainu (an Ethnic Japanese people), although a definitive affiliation has not been established
How could you explain this, /his/?.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirit_Cave_mummy
Shut it down!
>>1595517
>caucasoid
>ainu
Kek
>>>/trash/
Soooo... Amerindian immigrants, when are you leaving?
>>1595544
But Celto-Germanics aren't native to Western Europe so if we go with your principle we need need to forcibly remove all Anglos/Celts to Russia and clone the original natives back to life before repeating the process in America, that is if the Solutrean hypothesis is true the European would have to be done regardless.
>>1595739
>Western Europe
What an arbitrary specification
Eurasia - One continent, one people
>>1595746
Wrong. Western Europeans had 30000 years of genetic seperation before they were displaced in their lands by Neolithic farmers and Russkie horsefucking steppe scum.
Indo-Europeans actually are related to Native Americans through a genetic component called Ancient North Eurasian. When the Englishman arrived on the American shores he saw the face of his Siberian cousin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mal'ta-Buret'_culture
>>1595739
Celto-Germanics aren't pure Indo-European, most of their genes come from aboriginal European stock, especially on the mitochondrial side.
>>1595751
>When the Englishman arrived on the American shores he saw the face of his Siberian cousin.
that and the fact vikings had been colonising the area for a thousand years or more
phonecians etc
>>1595759
Nope since the Atlantic region was invaded by smelly, ugly Anatolians who didn't mix much with the natives before the Russkie horsefuckers rode in and slit their throats and used their women as fucktoys.
And the descendents of this interhominid rape claim Solutrean heritage and North America, lmao.
Even if the Injuns did the same they didn't do anything that Celto-Germanic ancestors didn't.
>>1595765
The Viking visits were brief and had no lasting impact, the Basque who fished the area didn't make landfall at all if they could avoid it, the Irish who may have visited it left no trace, and if the Phonecians reached the Americas then this is the first I'm hearing of it. For all intents and purposes, Columbus was the first to reach America, and he wasn't English.
>>1595770
>Anatolids
You mean the neolithic substrate? They're dominant around the Med but not elsewhere, Europe is home to several races but they all share very large to majority aboriginal genes.
>>1595776
Nope they lived even in Ireland in nearly pure form prior to horsefuckers. They seem to have had a deeply ingrained aversion towards mixing with European natives.
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35179269
>>1595781
>The work shows that early Irish farmers were similar to southern Europeans.
>DNA analysis of the Neolithic woman from Ballynahatty, near Belfast, reveals that she was most similar to modern people from Spain and Sardinia. But her ancestors ultimately came to Europe from the Middle East, where agriculture was invented.
>The males from Rathlin Island, who lived not long after metallurgy was introduced, showed a different pattern to the Neolithic woman. A third of their ancestry came from ancient sources in the Pontic Steppe - a region now spread across Russia and Ukraine.
Okay. What was your point, again?
>>1595789
Southern Europeans are the Anatolians circa 7000 BC with some European, Indo-European and Moorish admixture. This is all very basic, well studied stuff and nothing I said is speculative.
>>1595770
>Who didnt mix much with the natives
French are 50-60% Anatolian