>he paid 20,000 francs for each night he spent with a woman

>20,000 francs for each night he spent with a woman
A laughable sum when compared to the cost of a princess or queen consort

t. Joo

>>1581164
because I also am a manlet loser

>>1581164
he went his own way

>>1581164
Because he changed the world in a permanent way. And yet somehow him having a lover that cheated on him negates any respect for him.

And isn't this you're greatest legacy,/pol/? Somehow the sexual lives of great men mean more to you then their actual accomplishments.
Not to mention you feel entitled to distort the word cuck into meaning basically anything you please.

Shitpost more intelligently, or gtfo.

>>1581323
i never mentioned that he was a cuck but thanks for reminding me

>A man's status as a man is correlated with how much pussy he will acquire throughout his life without paying for it

Then which man is a real man, because all men pay for pussy, whether it's through a direct transaction, or whether it's through mountains of debt and credit card expenditures over a period of several years with the same woman.

>>1581332
you already did. The male unable of consistently bedding women is not deserving of respect to you. Except this isn't the whole story of napoleon.

Why did you think this thread would make an interesting topic?

>>1581164
t. Anglo who can't bring law and civilization to Europe.

>>1581164
He wasn't a manlet, good job swallowing british propaganda.

The emperor doesn't sleep with sailor's whores, he sleeps with girls only an emperor can aford.

>>1581355
why are you so insecure and angry
>>1581358
he was short compared to his peers

>>1581358
>Napoleon wasn't small!!!

my favorite reddit meme

>>1581358
He was of average height for his time

>>1581360
Pointing out the obvious juvenile simplifications is just out of my interest in Napoleon.

Shitpost in a clever way that opens fresh discussion. This is a relatively new board that has some potential.

>>1581366
He was actually a bit taller than the average frenchman

>>1581366
5'6" isn't small.

File: 1837-napoleon-bonaparte-2.png (822KB, 817x517px) Image search: [Google]

822KB, 817x517px

>>1581369
>>1581372
the average frenchmen were not his peers
>>1581374
now you're just delusional

File: 1455836588038.gif (2MB, 196x300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 196x300px

>>1581375
>now you're just delusional
>average height of modern human is 5'7-5' 9"

>>1581375
Nicolas Gosse's paintings were done decades after the death of Napoleon, this is not an accurate representation of its height.

>>1581389
>5'6" isn't small.
>average height of modern human is 5'7-5' 9"
i'm not following your logic

>>1581392
Do you actively gauge a stranger's height while out in public? You may not, but considering you're a faggot, you probably do.

In either case, 2-3 inches makes fuck all difference when commanding an army of thousands.

>>1581406
>In either case, 2-3 inches makes fuck all difference when commanding an army of thousands.
but it does determine whether or not you're short you furious manlet

>>1581413
in what context? Why is this important to you?

>>1581418
multiple people said something objectively wrong and i corrected them idrc

>>1581164
Cost of a dowry for a major European princess would easily be 10x or more of that.

>manlet loser

British propaganda plz go. He was 6 feet tall.

Napoleon was actually 6'5 and played middle linebacker for the Oakland Raiders IIRC

>>1581389
>average height of modern human is 5'7-5' 9"
Lmao rest of the world's population are fucking gnomes then.

>>1581421
you brought up his height in the first place.

>>1581537
i called him a manlet because he was a manlet

i never said being a manlet was a bad thing though obviously it is

>>1581599
>i never said being a manlet was a bad thing though obviously it is
Thus by corollary, you brought up his height as a negative in the first place.

But of course, you're points are irrefutable, and a man who ended up so influential as to have an entire era named after him isn't deserving of respect because you said so.

>>1581630
>Thus by corollary, you brought up his height as a negative in the first place.
oh god fucking kill yourself for making me read that

>>1581640
Too many multi-syllabic words for you, troglodyte?

>>1581655
i bet you're underage

>>1581661
Oh. Well. No u.
That all you got?

>>1581677
no i genuinely think you're underage if you're this lacking in self-awareness

>>1581684
you're condescending to me for not taking a shitpost thread seriously? What a shame. So many great points were brought up.