>>1578410
Ignore that map. It's pure bullshit.
And of course. All ancient civilizations had slavery. Hunnic slaves turn up in Priscus and Procopius I believe.
>>1578410
Huns never controlled that much of the Caucasus, the Sassanids literally wrecked an army of Huns outside of Ctesiphon and again in Armenia/Georgia.
>>1578432
They didn't control anything other than the Pannonian Basin and a few other surrounding tributary tribes. People forget that the Huns were on the move, they didn't hold Alania at the same time as Sirmium hundreds of miles away.
>>1578410
>Scythians
>Sarmatians
>"Turkic"
What kind of half-assed retarded 19th century map is this?
>>1578548
idk desu found it on google sorry friend
>>1578548
Turkish people. They are butthurt trying to be Turkic and stating that all Nomadic asian-looking horsepeople were Turkic. The funny thing is Turkish people are not Turkic, more a Mix of Armenians and Greeks
>>1579612
Even then though...Scythians, Sarmatians, Dahae, Saka,etc...weren't Mongoloids or Asian looking people.
>>1578615
Huns.
Hungary.
Hmm.
>>1580140
The word Hungary isn't derived from Huns. They don't even call themselves Hungarians in their language, they call themselves Magyars.
>>1580129
"turkic" groups were already a mixed race all the way back in 100bc
>>1580211
WUZ
>>1581757
HUNS
>>1581951
Scythian is just a Greek historiographical term that was horribly misused as a literary cliche. Historians even referred to the Slavs as Scythians in the late 1st millenium.
>>1582062
Wrong. It was misused yes, but it definitely referred to a specific culture group. One that spoke an Iranian language. We can even identify it with type sites and in historical records of the period.
Just because (much) later authors confused them with other people's doesn't make their existence and culture any less real or we'll document.
Ffs we have existing scythian texts.