Why were vikings such terrible fighters?
The English and Byzantines didn't think so
>>1577411
why do you need to be good at fighting if everyone you're attacking are defenseless monks and peasants?
>>1577411
Look mom I posted it again.png
>>1577414
>the English
the same ones who rekt them?
>>1577422
The same ones who kept an expensive standing army of vikings
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thingmen
>>1577437
Was England just a huge viking vs viking fuckfest?
Can someone remind me what's so wrong to whenever possible avoid pitched battles?
It's because scandinavians have inherent need for sucking cock.
>>1577447
Can someone remind me what's so warrior like about avoiding battles and going for pregnant women?
>>1577455
It's smart.
>>1577439
Only three ethnic groups existed during the low Middle Ages
Vikings, Normans, and Kebab
>>1577458
Does that include Spain, Greece, Italy, Ireland and eastern Europe, Egypt, Japan, China and Mexico?
>>1577497
>Spain
Kebab
>Greece
Viking and Norman mercenaries
>Italy
Normans in the South, Normans in the North
>Ireland
Normans
>Eastern Europe
Vikings
>Egypt, Japan, China and Mexico
Off topic. This board's only for discussion of Early Medieval history in Europe.
>>1577422
>the same ones who rekt them?
>rekt them?
um... anon that's not what happened
>>1577661
They still got rekt in France.
>>1577682
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Paris_(845)
>>1577713
Whole one instance of them winning how impressive.
>>1577754
read the whole page it talks about them attacking other cities like hamburg and the danish vikings taking advantage of the Frankish civil wars
>>1577661
>He wrote in English.
>>1577792
>attacking a country during civil war
so impressive
>other cities
undefended cities
>>1577856
An English that is closer to Norwegian than its West-Germanic brethren
http://www.pagef30.com/2008/08/why-norwegian-is-easiest-language-for.html
>>1577926
Called English nevertheless.
Why does /his/ so readily accept the meme that Vikings were bad fighters?
>>1578152
Because its full of Christards and Leftists who hate white paganism.
>>1578152
Because there is no proof they were good fighters.
>>1577437
Wasn't that only for 40 years and also organized by a Danish king?
>>1577415
But imagine the sick finishing moves they could pull on some one off peasant.
>>1577411
"Vikings" as in soldiers or raiders from north weren't bad fighters on an individual basis but they lacked the organisation and tactics of a sophisticated military thus would fail against a real army.
>>1577713
Daily reminder Vikings were defeated by French but still given Normandy so they could defend France against their brethren. They settled and by 3 generations they were completely French in culture and traditions.
>>1578166
>Because its full of Christards and Leftists who hate white paganism.
Again with the meme that Christians hate Pagans.
look, when the pagans left their containment pens they got ruffed up a bit, Christians didn't hate them personally they just didn't like walking around like they had some watermelon nuts.
If Pagans are going to act all hard then why do they always cry over being outfought?
God is so hard he got Mary pregnant without even touching her, Odin literally sucks dick>>1577448
Christ is the OG from the eastside, you Pagans better step the fuck up or get lost.
They didn't hate them, they were just better than them.
By the way, is it churches or sacred groves that now dominate Europe?
Quick empirical test, infallible, and easy to conduct.
>>1578386
>one instance in long history of conflict between raiders and armies where majority of raiders lost almost every single time
>completely proves they are as good as a regular or levied army because they managed it once against detached force
Nice logic
>>1578405
>is it churches or sacred groves that now dominate Europe?
we call them mosques now anon
>>1577713
>>1578386
You do realize the Vikings outnumbered the Franks significantly and the Franks had little more than the local levy at their disposal?
Not to take away from the Viking victory, but 7,000 veteran raiders against 4,000 Levy isn't much of a fight, the fact the Frankish men were even able to put up a fight is a testament to their bravery.
>>1578418
ouch.....
>filename
kek, Christianity's autistic little brother wins.
>>1577856
"The earliest form of English is called Old English or Anglo-Saxon (c. 550–1066 CE). Old English developed from a set of North Sea Germanic dialects originally spoken along the coasts of Frisia, Lower Saxony, Jutland, and Southern Sweden by Germanic tribes known as the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes. In the fifth century"
English comes from the same areas as the vikings came from
>>1578509
Indeed which demonstrates that it was academic scholarship introduced through Christianity which allowed Anglo-Saxon culture to stand head and shoulders above their barbarian cousins.
>>1577411
younger brother of europe snydrome, always receiving the handmedowns