Given a choice between a perfect fake and the original, which

More valuable to whom?

File: senjougahara.jpg (93KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1280x720px

>>1574479
Kaiki pls go

>>1574479
If they are the EXACT same then they should logically be worth the same. Being the original adds no properties to the object, just changes what we think of it

>>1574479
if the orginal one has provenance proving its originality, then the original one is more valuable, at least to collectors.

A perfect fake would not be a fake, otherwise it would not be perfect. So what you have are two inexplicably identical things.

Either one has identical value, until the existence of a perfect copy is known.

Japan please, go fuck yourself.
I know you care, but its wrong, and even you know its wrong.

>>1574479
Depends on what we are replicating here.

Is it the shit I took this morning? Well, congratulations you've got yourself a perfect copy of my turd. Is tha treally valuable to anyone apart from the guy who made the fake to show off his abilities?

Is it the Mona Lisa? The Pyramids? A porsche?

You get the idea.

Basically, this: >>1574649

A forger would be more interested in the fake.
A thief mor interested in the original.
A trader would not care if he could sell both without a price difference.