Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Anonymous
For macrosystemic advance based on a philosophical breakthrough 2016-08-18 13:39:44 Post No. 1566525
[Report] Image search: [Google]
For macrosystemic advance based on a philosophical breakthrough 2016-08-18 13:39:44 Post No. 1566525
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: explosions.gif (2MB, 200x200px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 200x200px
For macrosystemic advance based on a philosophical breakthrough
Anonymous
2016-08-18 13:39:44
Post No. 1566525
[Report]
The following could amount to a crucial and timely philosophical breakthrough. It seems to be very close to what Immanuel Kant called the philosophers' stone.
Delusionally oversimplified: A new philosophical backbone for a global order,regional orders, local orders, personal orders, some degree more potent than communism.
The set of questions
"Do I seem free enough?
If yes, for how long probably?
If so, what could I do that seems best for all?"
could maybe form the root of a new ethics. It gives people a "start for thinking", which accounts for a basic bipolarity: (non-deity-) agents have two high objectives:
-existential/recurring personal liberation, for example from itch or death, and
-moral activity which attempts, what seems to be best for all.
This may seem abstract, but in the time it grew with me, it raised some heavy/influential consequences:
- a bipolarity for the political landscape, that seems scalable from the individual to the whole of humanity, and that at the same time seems much more cooperative, as every human experiences both parties' central objectives in his daily life. Maturing democracy's appeal big time.
- some basic root thoughts for an artificial intelligence, that could invoke a reasoned, largely beneficial stance on humanity (in case you mind: see "control problem")
(continued)
>>
(2/2)
And it has some important conclusions for the present years' situation:
- Liberation is important only besides "best for all", therefore there has to be a dynamic limit to it: "increasingly voluntary liberations sum equality" (Binding engagement subtracts from liberation.)
- Liberation, that is ignorant of other agents, risks their antiliberation, pressing them to liberate themselves as well. This possible mutually ignorant subgroup liberation can spiral down. The way out, even for past events, seems to be "increasingly voluntary antiliberation compensation".
The first point would ease inequality tensions and the second would slow downward spirals in politics, economics... from small to big scale.
-If you mind, take these last points to a news page of your flavour and test them.
-Please be careful implementing, I am too poor to compensate damage done.
-I cherish anonymity here, as I seem productive that way and I guess, that with a public position that would change, to long term detriment.
-I learned to prefer gradual evolution over disruptive revolution. This system should help with that.
-The MOST URGENT consequence seems to be, that people keep calm and go on in their doings, now seemingly assured of improvement, to avoid systemic seizure.
Thanks for all good
All good to all
>>
File: primitive-man2-e1394477198809.jpg (100KB, 560x420px) Image search:
[Google]
100KB, 560x420px
>>1566525
>errr'dayyy
>>
>>1566545
Thanks for replying.
>>
I eagerly await questions and promise to answer them as good as I can.
Thread posts: 5
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2