Prolefeed

Really, nobody has anything to contribute?

>>1557819
Why would I contribute to such a shitty thread?

>>1557819
I have nothing to contribute, but I wish you the best.

>>1557904
I'll bet you think "redpill me on x" threads have more substance.

i think this breaks the 25 year rule

>>1557998
Nothing in this thread breaks the 25 year rule except for mentioning Fox News (founded 1996).

Stop trying to silence opinions you don't like.

>>1555443
To be fair I think Fukuyama's hypothesis was more reasonable-soubding in the pre-9/11 era. Obviously the guy revised his opinions afterwards. I don't agree with him entirely but he makes some good points. I wouldn't call him complete establishment plebshit, since he at least acknowledges that the US is pretty much in the early stages of collapse.

>>1558027
>in America today
you can voice your opinions on news channels, but the correct board to do it on is /tv/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWVNDfDSE44

>>1558082
Those channels and newspapers are over 25 years old, and have established themselves as living history. And there is more in this post than just news channels and newspapers.

And mentioning Fox sarcastically doesn't break the 25 year rule.

>>1555443
You thread is oriented against one part of the political spectrum(i think it's the left though i don't know truly the american politic, it may be the right) and is clearly here to circlejerk against the left. I know 4chan and /his/ are shit but at least think we have a brain.
So go to some shit place for some circlejerk, here we circlejerk on the german and the Anglo scum.

>>1558194
>you thread is oriented against one part of the political spectrum
No it is not you ninny.

>and is clearly here to circlejerk against the left
USAToday and PNAC are conservative and neoconservative respectively. The rest are "left" in name only. Schlesinger constantly defended US imperialism and the Brooking Institute is basically centrist now, its been drifting rightward ever since the 80s.

If this thread is biased against anything its biased against imperialism, be it left or right. It's pretty evenly handed to both sides I'd say.

But since you say
>i don't know truly the american politic
I'll give you a pass.

>>1558232
What the problem with imperialisme? The American are mean with their "freedom" but they kept the world at peace(well, more peaceful than before) and better capitalist democratic free asshole than facist/comunist autocratic chinese/russe asshole.

>>1558232
Also this topic is neither historical nor humanities(i think).

>>1555443
Everything made for public consumption is intellectually bankrupt by necessity. I don't really see the point of singling any of those out. Media and institutions funded to push an interest group's agenda are also corrupt by default.

If I had to nominate a shit historian here, I'd go with Victor Davis Hanson.

>>1558313
Thank you for contributing more to this thread than anyone else has so far.

Care to add more substance and explain why you chose Victor Davis Hanson?

>unwoke

Fucking Americans

>>1555443
>unwoke
>bluepilled
>globalist

Man, all you had to add was leftist and cuck and you had the perfect buzzword soup going on there.

>>1558348
Actually as far as science is concerned Jesus didn't exist.

>>1558357
Unwoke is used by leftists, and so is globalist. Nice job omitting trite, whigg, panglossian, and prolefeed, from your greentext.

Lets count shall we.

Schlesinger - liberal
CNN, Brookings - centrist
Fox, PNAC, USAToday - conservative/right of center

Huh, looks like most of those people and organizations are right wing or right of center. Nice job reading.

>>1558342
He's guilty of misinterpreting history to fit the Western triumphalist narrative, mostly in support of neocon agendas. More generally, I have never seen him write ANYTHING that didn't instrumentalize history to support his side, linking any famous historical event (preferably ancient) to modern American geopolitics. He specializes in morale-boosting through historical analogies.

>>1558385
Huh, woah, looks like, I, um, blew you the fuck... out? Oops!

>>1558385
Buzzwords aren't just a right-wing thing ph@m. I'm glad you got super defensive when you thought that I implied that though.

>>1558367
You are an idiot.

File: 41LEbzwO3FL._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (33KB, 333x499px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 333x499px

>>1558487
no u

>>1558474
4/10 made me reply

>>1558027
Wat. What was the before Fox?

I want you people to contradict me.

I raise you all one Federation of American [Nuclear] Scientists.