What are the differences between Max Stirner's and Ayn Rand's

>>1545207
Rand's is full of spooks while Stirner's is full of memes

Rand believes in some spooky shit, like property rights or that earning money = rational self interest.

>>1545207
they both are adversarial to morality

One major one I can think of off the top of my head is that Rand thinks that there are inalienable rights,
while Stirner thinks quite the contrary.

Though, I'm not too familiar with Objectivism, so I won't say much more.
I'll just leave it at both philosophical methodologies entail vastly different conclusions.

>One major one I can think of off...
English is a retsrded language

File: 535e0369817a1a043162f10cb754a876bb47e1b9ee45fd2df6e377760e6a7ab2_1.jpg (166KB, 795x799px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 795x799px

>>1545207
memes

>NAP

wew

Stirner is a hegelian and Rand is a crabby old lady

Ayn Rand really believes in what I would call "passive altruism" , or she believes that respecting other people's rights (as she defined their rights in her philosophy) somehow magically never conflicts with self-interest.

Rand's philosophy is full of baseless and unjustifiable claims and subjective opinions presented as the objective truths. Max Stirner's philosophy is just one big "d'oh, of course", really obvious and banal stuff - except that we often somehow manage to convince ourselves that what he's saying isn't true.

>>1545207
One of them is a sociopath, the other one is just autistic.

>>1545207

Rand was a retard. Stirner was not.

>>1545207
Stirner was insufferable, Rand was insatiable. The wiseass and the whore.

Because Rand's philosophy was nothing more than a fan wank that exists nowhere outside of her own fiction.

Stirner at least had the decency to admit spooks are spooks and call bullshit where he saw it.