Reminder doing nothing is literally the only justifiable choice.

>>1542049
Why's that?

File: 1446083059788.jpg (12KB, 201x262px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 201x262px

>>1542049
What if I pull the lever and them pull it back?

>>1542066
Oh, man. Pink lemonade just brought some childhood memories back

>>1542049

Could I have the train go in reverse and kill people on both tracks?

>>1542065
>Why's that?
Because there is no 'correct' choice when being forced to chose between lives.

>>1542080
So if you had the choice to spare 1000 people or 1 person at the expense of the others what would you do?

>>1542080
In that case I kill everyone. That edgy enough for you faggot?

>>1542080
Watch out guys, it's a young adult who watched doctor who coming at this board with his fierce moral rhetoric.

>>1542080
Okay, if there's no correct choice, let's look at the consequences.
> I'm ostracized either way. Which one will get me more flak from my "poor" decision skills is up in the air.
> I'm a murderer legally if I pull the lever, also fucked in a bystanders must do something country which I live in. "But legal matters are independent of ethics you property :^)" comes into play by you colossal edgelord fags

Alright then, since we can't answer the question with your sense of morality and ethics, give me one good reason (not antinatalist meme-tastic views) why this isn't simply a utilitarian matter now.

>>1542095
Honestly depends on the one person. If that one guy tied to the tracks is a genius doctor who'll discover the cure for cancer, then letting the thousand die to potentially save millions is worth it.

>>1542474
"what if" isn't part of the question. save 1 or save 1000, which is it?

>caring about justification
>needing morals to do what's good

>>1543210
And which choice is good?

File: smug.jpg (7KB, 228x221px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 228x221px

>>1543214
my choice.

>>1542095
I would not make a choice. There is no justification for murder of human life