Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: dreams.jpg (3MB, 3456x2298px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 3456x2298px
What are /his/ thoughts about noocracy? How would it look like? That's how I do:
>Power distribution works as it is now does in science community : the more proficient and successful in ruling practice one gets higher post. Observation and assignment are performed by specialised authority, which members are specially educated professionals and former governors. This authority makes a decision, that determines reliability of a candidate based on observations of his/her previous work results. However, it have nor the direct legislative and executive, and judicial power and have to be highly secured and transparent. The candidates on key posts, like president or minister are determined by highly dependable committee, which chooses from among experienced governors, or the ones that have shown eminent talent or abilities. Basically, this department is studying current political, economical and social situation with a scientific approach, and bases it's decisions on huge amount of verified data.
> and then i woke up.
Share your opinion on this.
>>
>>1541108
*thats how I do see it* my bad
>>
>>1541108
>Basically, this department is studying current political, economical and social situation with a scientific approach
That would be great if economics, sociology and polsci weren't bullshit pseudoscience. Also, how do you expect to stop the proles from rebelling without turning them against each other?
>>
>>1541215
>Economics
>sociology
>pseudoscience
>>
>>1541215
> money isn't abstract mathematical essence.
>there is no way to collect data of social and economical status of population, on example.
>>>/school/
>>
File: 84.5.43.1_3_lead_painting.jpg (2MB, 3717x1959px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3717x1959px
>>1541108
Sounds like a technocracy
>>
>>
>>1541215
Economics isn't pseudoscience, it's not a natural science, but it is a quantitative science. Several areas of econometrics have good predictive power. How many econ courses have you taken?
>>
>>1541748
>muh invisible hand
>>
>>1541215
>Also, how do you expect to stop the proles from rebelling without turning them against each other?
What if entry into the system was meritocratic, sort of like old Chinese bureaucrat exams? Hell, extend student governments into the actual government body.
>>
>>1541874
That sounds logic.
I think the two most problematic side of this are giving better education for governance and not just having good will for participation, and a realistic way for participation in decision making.
>>
>>1541108
Isn't that just the more loosely defined definition of a technocracy?
>>
>>1541816
I... don't understant what you're trying to say or imply here. Have you actually attempted to make a serious study of econ or are you making judgments based on what you've heard secondhand? Because I've known a lot of economists over the years and they are generally levelheaded, rational people. Econ phd programs are all extremely math-heavy and evidence-based.
>>
>>1541919
But in technocracy there are no details as to how authorities get elected anon.
>>
>>1541929
They infer a lot, using the maths afterwards. But I am not the anon who said those are pseudosciences, just making a point.
>>
>>1541973
I mean, induction is a buggy reasoning and in economics they pretend to know exactly why things work when they don't, and when they fail they put up shitty excuses.
Thread posts: 16
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2