/script>
Post systems of government better than democratic republicanism.
Neocameralism.
>Political agents invested with transient authority by multi-party democratic systems have an overwhelming (and demonstrably irresistible) incentive to plunder society with the greatest possible rapidity and comprehensiveness. Anything they neglect to steal – or ‘leave on the table’ – is likely to be inherited by political successors who are not only unconnected, but actually opposed, and who can therefore be expected to utilize all available resources to the detriment of their foes. Whatever is left behind becomes a weapon in your enemy’s hand. Best, then, to destroy what cannot be stolen. From the perspective of a democratic politician, any type of social good that is neither directly appropriable nor attributable to (their own) partisan policy is sheer waste, and counts for nothing, whilst even the most grievous social misfortune – so long as it can be assigned to a prior administration or postponed until a subsequent one – figures in rational calculations as an obvious blessing. The long-range techno-economic improvements and associated accumulation of cultural capital that constituted social progress in its old (Whig) sense are in nobody’s political interest. Once democracy flourishes, they face the immediate threat of extinction.
monarchy of city-states
Technocratic ruling branch with a democratic republican goal-setting + boundary-setting + power-checking branch.
>>1535592
dis right here
although nothing on a global scale would get done
>>1535508
Need I even say it?
Parliamentarianism
>>1535659
It has such a successful track record.
>>1535665
True fascism has never been tried, man
>>1535508
>government
wew
>>1535807
I hope for you sake that this is bait
>>1535807
>marriage between corporation and state has never been tried
Nigerian, literally every government does this.
>>1535810
>tripfaggotry
I pity you
>>1535508
>democratic republicanism
>>1535659
Faggot?