Who was in the right?
YORK
O
R
K
>the right?
The rose of might
York duh
France
>>1532418
It's a retarded succession war.
Which means: the guy who won.
>>1532521
/thread.
>>1532418
YORK
Not just because I'm from Yorkshire
>>1532521
Which successor was the best for England?
>>1532521
But House Tudor won, which is neither of them.
>>1532418
Henry VII had barely any right, but he won the battle so that's all that really matters
>>1533434
he did have a few drops of plantaganet blood from his mother
York. When the Duke of Hereford (Henry IV) cucked Richard II off the throne, the descendant of Lionel of Antwerp should have ascended to it. The line of the Duke of York later married into this superior claim
>>1533439
>mother
Yes and his father was only a Welsh knight. Patrilineal descent mattered far more than matrilineal. And Richard III's father was a Plantagenet. It's not even a question, Richard was entitled to the throne
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLongUBPm5Y
My husbando, obviously.
>>1532661
Probably Richard.
>>1533385
Given that Henry I was a Lancastrite who married a Yorkist, couldn't you say they both ended up winning? As stupid as that sounds.
>>1533968
Henry VII. Sorry for the typo.
>>1533968
>just like my theater play
oh wait, too early
Lannisters!
>>1533968
>One side kills the leader of the other side
>Oh, but hey, it's like we both won
>>1534968
>random fourth rate cousin barely a rank above peasant manages to win the throne after the entire family is massacred or exiled
>doesn't even call himself a member of your house
>WE WON LADS
>>1532418
both
>>1532418
Queen Elizabeth and by extension her family the house of Woodville
were with the Lancastrians when it was appropriate, moved onto the Yorkist cause when it was most logical
Jacquetta led and trained a cunning pack of swamp witches
true king probably should've been Prince Richard "Perkin" Plantagenet of York though