Give me one reason why society or "the greater good" should ever come before the individual. Pro tip: you can't.
you need a balance between the 2
Nationalism is the answer
a collective group whose common identity gives them enough cohesion to allow personal freedoms
anything else you either have Despotic States like absolute monarchies and communism or Anarchism and Tribalism
>>1523224
Game theory.
Co-operation is the best strategy for maximising the well being of the individual.
>>1523245
only with in-group preferences
in-group preferences eventually wins with total cooperation by not reciprocating the total cooperation group's support
>>1523254
>only with in-group preferences
I'm not sure I agree with you on this, but it doesn't matter.
You've just conceded that the greater good of a group should come before the individual in order to maximise the wellbeing of individuals.
So unless you're trying to shift the goalposts then the thread is won.
Thank you, that was the easiest capitulation ever.
I am currently reading:
The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies
Note it is not talking of diversity the way the left talks of it but rather diversity in terms of different perspective and ways of doing things.
>>1523224
what if i told you they're pretty much the same
individualist societies work because the needs of individuals being met correlates quite directly with a society's ability. the issues arise when the individual and the collective are seen in opposition. if you can't get them to agree then your shit's fucked no matter what. is it better to amputate a limb or die of necrosis? sure, one is probably better than the other, but you should really be asking yourself why you are in that situation.
>>1523224
Two individuals cooperating for mutual benefit is a collective. The logical conclusion of individualism is something like anarcho-primitivism.
>>1523224
> Cucks one of her peers
> "Guys individualism means you can do whatever you want"
> Get cucked back
> "What the fuck how could you"
>>1523270
Oh yea, so from that I conclude that teams are the best. Yaneer Bar Yam says similar things.
>>1523313
It was in her interest to run other people's lives.
>>1523224
I really find it strange that people are either
>Love everything about Ayn Rand
or
>Think she was the devil
We can just acknowledge that some of what she spoke about had merit and some things did not.
>>1523245
I don't think a single individualist/libertarian has ever denied that you have higher productivity in the division of labor.
>>1523224
people need individual rights to protect them from abuse, but people are social animals and will naturally form groups and group consciousness on their own.
Its really not one or the other
>>1523691
I didn't mention the division of labour, though.
I was talking about game theory.