Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
Anonymous
theism/deism argument 2016-08-01 14:16:32 Post No. 1492429
[Report] Image search: [Google]
theism/deism argument 2016-08-01 14:16:32 Post No. 1492429
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Weird argument for theism:
-Basic reasoning, like recognizing the truth of axioms of logic, can't be logicly validated
-It is an innate ability to recognise them as true
-Existance of god is an equally valid basic truth that is validly recogniseable without justification, just like the axioms/fundamentals of logic
I mean, you could basicly justify anything with that approach, so its clearly nonsense, and it seems to conflate recognising a basic ability to have coherent thoughts at all with some very specific idea about the universe, but what else is wrong with it?
Maybe I'm just too tired to see some obvious flaws or something.
>>
>arguments for God
>>
bump
>>
If I hear the logical arguments for God restated one more time I'm gonna put a bullet in my brain. bump
>>
>>1493210
Did you know that Aquinas *literally* proved God?
>>
>>1493210
First time i heard something like this, and except "this literally proves nothing and just immitates and mockes reason" I don't know what specific points I could say about it.
Is it just too fucked up to even take it apart?
>>
File: SjytDx7.jpg (32KB, 453x604px) Image search:
[Google]
32KB, 453x604px
bump
>>
>>1492429
> all those nonsense words
There is no evidence. Period.
>>
>>1494126
Well, OP said it was an ARGUMENT, not evidence or proof.
>>
>>1494140
OP here, the dude that gave me that argument said its basicly proof. And because I can't prove without logic that logic is valid, he doesn't have to prove god, because its just true or something in the same way that logical axioms are true.
I get that this is retarded, I just can't seem to find the words to explain properly why it's retarded.
>>
final desperate bump
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3