Ethnicities with diverse gene pools

subsaharan blacks have the most biodiversity despite what is shared and common.

negroes

Americans

>>1488415
>americans
>ethnicity

really dude?

File: Turkey_Y_chromosome(in_20_haplogroups).png (40KB, 1037x848px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 1037x848px

Turkish people.

>>1488213
Cape Coloureds are the most given all the genetic components. Western European, Bantu, Khoi, South East Asian, Indian, with some minor papuan like genes from as well.

Arabs

>>1488227
>>1488403
Not an ethnic group

File: Meyers_b1_s0148d.jpg (453KB, 2048x1734px) Image search: [Google]

453KB, 2048x1734px

negroids

File: Ethiopia.jpg (4MB, 1478x7272px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1478x7272px

>>1488490
>>1488403
>>1488227
Are you guys stupid? Here is a list I made of nearly all of Ethiopia's ethnic groups. And that's just one country in Africa

Race=/=ethnic group

>>1488501
>race=/=ethnic group
genetic clustering analysis would like a word with you

>>1488501
I'm pretty sure you could just split them into 3 or 4 groups.

slavs

>>1488516
>>1488514
An ethnic group isn't just about genetics, it is also about shared cultural background. The OP asked specifically about ethnic groups, not races or sub-types

>>1488592
if those are the goalposts, India would also be in the running

>>1488213
Central Asia.

That region is a bukkake of genes.

>>1488616
Again, OP is talking about individual ethnic groups. I may be wrong but the Pamiris seem to be inbred, due to isolation and looking very similar to each other, while some other ethnic groups are more diverse.

>>1488213
turks, probably. because of turkification and "ne mutlu türküm diyene" the population of turkey is a melting pot of turkified greeks, anatolians, caucasians, kurds, arabs, etc. with only about 10% of actual central asian turkic dna, but they all ethnically call themselves "turks" anyway.

>>1488465

Burgerland

>>1488501
Holy shit that Afar guy looks like muh Egyptian mural paintings

>>1488213
People from Sicily are pretty diverse. Also Argentines, if you consider them an ethnicity are fairly diverse as well.

Jews. You got black, Chinese, Ashkenazi, Arab, Indian jews who all mingled their local population before returning all to israel. Give it 100-150 years and they'll be like the Turks.

>>1488519
I was also thinking about Slavs but unironically it has to be Turks. They're diverse beyond imaginable.

File: christian black.png (898KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

898KB, 640x1136px

>>1488592
Ehhh, theres no standardisation at all. Because they're obscure to the west they're all deemed as different cultures and ethnic groups, but in reality some of them will be so minor in differences that i could do the same and say people from Lancashire and people from Cornwall are two different ethnic groups, look how diverse England is.

File: random_hawt_flip.jpg (73KB, 426x640px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 426x640px

>>1488213
I suppose, collectively, the people of the Philippines represent more cross-bred races than just about any other identifiable collective, having been colonized by just about everyone at one point or another, and having a high enough Asian bent to represent the Indian/Chinese numbers.

One day, we may all look like this (but probably not as hot)... Though maybe a bit darker, as they've not been visited enough by Africa to represent their future numbers.