Just how accurate is this?i understand that there are always two sides of a story,and a part of me wants to think it is true.i am just not to sure what to think of it in terms of accuracy. And no,im not a racist.im not pointing that out because i think otherwise,i just know someone is going to say "go back to /pol/ you dumb fuck" or something along those lines.
Thanks guys.
>muh nostalgia
>muh platitudes
>>1487702
It may indeed, be this man's experience.
In any oppressive society, there are always people who benefit from the regime.
Look at any authoritarian state.
There are always a favored people.
It's the "other" who is stained and impure.
>>1487702
Of course children fucking loved it, they would have all been brainwashed after the education reforms as aprt of the Nazification of Germany. THe Hitler Youth's and the LEague of German Maiden's purpose was to brainwash kids in ot become ideal aryans.
>Some minorites suffered
>Some people suffered but they deserved it
>Playing the suffering down this much
It's really easy to tell that this is coming from someone who was brainwashed as a child.
It's important to stop seeing history as "good vs evil", however
>tremendous blabla on culture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_of_the_Third_Reich#Individual_artists_forbidden_in_the_Third_Reich
>>1487702
For all I understand about german culture Hitler seemed to be the absolute perfect guy to rule so maybe it's true.
I imagine a very german germania under Hitler.
Of course nostalgia of old times + bitterness of new times can add drama to the description.
>>1487933
Nazi art was shit. Art, science and the humanities were purely propaganda mechanisms.
All art had to be approved by Goebbles and his ministry so that it conveyed positive messages about the Nazis and Germans.