The fundamental flaw in Marxism.

>>1450512


Just like the cuckold surrenders sexual capacity to the superior male, the proletariat surrenders economic power to the bourgeoisie, out of a knowledge, deep down, that they can do more, do better with it. They WANT to be at the bottom of the totem pole, and will fight to defend their own degradation, and the economic masochism endemic in it, because they realize their failure as economic actors and wish to never be put into a position of having to act on their economic impulses. As a wage slave, you don't need to make decisions. Tighten that winch, get your pay, go home. The sorts of actual investment choice or managerial decisions that need to be made would terrify the prolecuck, and he fetishizes his own inability to function at this higher level into supporting a system that keeps him from it, and enjoying such. That is why as more and more barriers to entry into the bourgeois class disappear, you see more and more barriers erected from the proleteriat class springing up, if the upper classes aren't going to keep them down, they MUST do it themselves.

Until Marxists can understand this fundamental basis of human social interaction, they will never actually succeed in putting their ideas into practice.

'Wew'.

i think you have a strong point regarding the inability of many proletarians to be able to control their own destiny should they be given the economic keys. i think most marxists are sympathetic to this- they know that the proletariat will not immediately be able to rule themselves. after centuries of representative democracy and lacking any real economic authority, it will take time to develop those skills such that the representative democratic state and the labor manager are no longer necessary. this is certainly true.

however, just because the proles are unable at the moment to control their own destiny doesn't mean that they don't deserve to control it, or that they shouldn't. and their inability to perform some bourgeoisie functions now doesn't mean they can't be taught that they are not capable of learning them, or are not deserving of being able to pilot their destinies. this is why marxism supposes a state in the initial phase of the revolution, because it is understanding of the initial wall that will be necessary for proles to climb.

it's an additional responsibility for the proles to be able to control their economic and political destiny. and some people would rather not have it. but some do. like myself. i would like to have more control over my economic and political destiny, and i am willing to accept the additional responsibility that comes with that choice. and i think that should enough people be convinced that they deserve more autonomy and power over their own lives, they will become more sympathetic to the communist purpose.

zozzle my m80, just.......zozzle.....