Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
File: 1461460132905.jpg (634KB, 1600x1200px)
634KB, 1600x1200px
Human logical behaviour does not exist.
There are a number of philosophies that, trough pure mathematical logic, prove that logic does not exist. For example, the argument of the primal premise, or Descartes' notion that the only thing that can indeed exist is my own consciousness. All behaviour and thought process ultimately results merely from the chain reactions of eletric discharges performing synapsis in the neurons of our nervous systems, and it cannot be assumed that these meaningless systems in any way reflect or accurately interpret the greater realm of existences of truths and reality.
>>
Why cant they reflect reality if they were shaped by it, just like a canyon?
>>
>>1401366
What would the canyon answer?
>>
>>1401372
Canyons can't think.
>>
>>1401374
Maybe we think just as much as canyons do.
>>
File: 1468163148617.jpg (5KB, 250x231px) Image search:
[Google]
5KB, 250x231px
>philosophies have used logic to prove that logic doesn't exist
>>
File: 1463848089436.jpg (464KB, 1280x1623px) Image search:
[Google]
464KB, 1280x1623px
OH BOY ITS THIS THREAD AGAIN
>>
>>1401358
Systems are definitely meaningful.
Neural systems computationally schematically analog internal and external environments. Frontolimbic systems heuristically evaluate these models and respond relatively rationally, though mistakes are commonplace.
Your understanding of physical randomness is a bit naive.
>>
>can't even tell me what matter is
>"it must be meaningless"
lol
>>
>>1401358
>Philosophies prove logic doesn't exist, by using logic.
>>
>>1401358
1+1=2 whatever language you use or however you imagine it
the squeexblars of the planet fliroplinon who are completely blind and deaf and have 3 simultaneously operating brains and imagine the world in terms of the texture of soil along lengths of tunnel imagine 1+1 = 2 in terms of the giant gourds they nibble on occasionally and protect from other species, in their notation it is as follows
ԫ֍֍ணெᴥ
yet they would be completely capable of understanding 1+1=2
Whatever your motivations, you must embrace reality and learn how the laws of physics work in order to achieve you goals and in doing so you end up developing the same concepts.
>>
>>1401358
Yet your brain made it possible for you to communicate this thought via typing. Hmm..
Thread posts: 12
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4