Karl Marx must have realized there is no such thing as a physical

Thread replies: 4
Thread images: 2

Constantine (ID: !!m+/90K/qoQS)
2016-07-05 12:52:01 Post No. 1374215
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: y.png (412KB, 4000x4000px) Image search: [Google]

Constantine (ID: !!m+/90K/qoQS) 2016-07-05 12:52:01 Post No. 1374215 [Report]

Karl Marx must have realized there is no such thing as a physical relation, all relations are metaphysical. So, stressing relations as paramount compared to the material, how was he a materialist?

Anonymous 2016-07-05 17:34:29 Post No.1375004
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-07-05 17:34:29 Post No.1375004 [Report]

File: 1464742168808.png (254KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 900x900px

>>1374215
>All relations are metaphysical

Anonymous 2016-07-05 17:54:02 Post No.1375056
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-05 17:54:02 Post No.1375056 [Report]

>>1374215
>Karl Marx must have realized there is no such thing as a physical relation, all relations are metaphysical.
Can you expand upon what exactly you mean by this point? Let's take the example "X is on top of Y"; what do you mean when you say that's a metaphysical relation?

Anonymous 2016-07-05 18:01:54 Post No.1375092
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-05 18:01:54 Post No.1375092 [Report]

>>1374215
He believed the material, natural world, including people, could be understood without reference to the supernatural, spiritual world. Hence he was a materialist.