What was so good about the ottoman bureacracy system that its

Literally what?
From late 16th century, it was tragically incompetent and weak, if you're referring to central government.
Stop listening to Turkish myths about how great OE was and how everyone loved it until nationalism just magically appeared.
It was incredibly shitty state for most of it's existence.

>>1328202
>Late 16th Century.
Wow, the period of Ottoman decline sure goes earlier and earlier for /pol/acks.

Because it was run by white slaves from Europe.

>>1328194
It didn't really do provinces so much as it focused on various classes of people instead, which meant it kept generally up to date censuses

File: image.jpg (60KB, 600x400px)

60KB, 600x400px

>>1328194
Wow.
I have NEVER heard it mentioned before.

>>1328207

Ottoman decline started with after Suleiman the Magnificent, this pretty commonly accepted historical consensus between historians.

You do realize that "decline" doesn't mean "it was utter shit immediately". The Byzantine Empire was constantly in decline, even though it had ups and downs and had times of greatness.