ITT battles with a highly ridiculous one sided casualty rate.

>>1327462
Excluding one man massacres and genocides of course

File: emuwar.jpg (23KB, 320x352px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 320x352px

>>1327462
I see Aussie revisionists have gotten to Wikipedia

Omdurman. Probably the most one sided in history.

gombe war

>>1327462
Watling street. Proof that if a people want to survive, they need to be well armed.

Can anyone recall any battles from WWII?

>>1327555
*any of these sorts of

>>1327559
In terms of percentages or raw numbers? Percentage wise, the battles in the Pacific were extremely one sided with the Japanese almost completely wiped out because they wouldn't surrender until there was a dozen or two left. This of course does not note just how hard fought the battles were, but it fits what you're asking for.

File: 100% kill rate.png (51KB, 325x677px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 325x677px

>>1327462
what have i done

>>1328038
madman
a
d
m
a
n

>>1328357
Why did the communist rebels perform so badly anyway?

File: 6ogkvY5.png (173KB, 316x871px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 316x871px

If I could go back in time to view any battle, it would probably be this one.

>>1328038
>Take 8 times as many casualties
>Still win the war

Damn Russia you scary

>>1328361
imagine a multiplayer game where one side has had a lot of practice while the other side has only just started playing, aren't allowed sniper rifles and other handicaps

>>1328061
lmao