mfw plutocrats still arguing about their socialism and capitalism

File: 1465159937342.gif (2MB, 360x202px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x202px

>Monarchist/fundamentalist roleplayers
>natsoc autists
>communist fairytale spewers
>

>>1285059
Get with the times gramps :^)

>>1285071
there were republics and democracies in the ancient times so who's to say monarchism is something meant to die out with the advancement of technology

>>1285093
Because as technology advanced republics became more powerful as the bourgeoisie became more powerful. The nobility will never be that powerful again, and the bourgeoisie aren't likely to develop into new nobility.

>>1285099
that was only because of the industrial revolution
>middle ages
>everything is stagnant
>aristocrats are mostly landowners
>ind. rev. and great geografical discoveries
>profit from capital gets a boom
>the bourgeoisie gets richer and stronger than aristocrats
>muh french rev.
>plutocrats win

which in itself would't be so bad if socialists weren't taking over the place

muh welfare

>>1285127
Socialism is the future.

Just as the bourgeoisie triumphed over the nobility it's inevitable that the proletariat would triumph over the bourgeoisie.

>>1285133
Proletariat can't triumph in school.

>>1285137
Doesn't matter.

>>1285133
>Just as the bourgeoisie triumphed over the nobility it's inevitable that the proletariat would triumph over the bourgeoisie.
[citation needed]