Is Eastern philosophy superior?

>>1195697
This oversimplifies things to the point where it's meaningless.

Taoism is individual while Platoism is universal.
"Adapt to external changes" is basically Stoicism.
I could go on but the thread has already started with such a retarded premise.

File: 1464120227628.jpg (16KB, 261x181px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 261x181px

>Eastern
>Philosophy

>>1195697
Hahaha, aren't you something! But in all seriousness, the Western-philosophy-is-superior-meme is also kind of lame.

Western philosophy does deal with some stuff that Eastern philosophy does not seem to handle, but I am a pleb so what do I know.

>>1195697
Eastern is better for reflection and better understanding on a broad scale. Western is better for practical everyday use in a narrow sense.

>>1195697
>eastern philosophy

File: pepehan.png (28KB, 624x434px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 624x434px

>Western
>Philosophy

taoism is identical to stoicism

>>1195697
Those are very uncharitable generalizations in your pic.

>Is Eastern philosophy superior?

No.

>>1195697
falling in the superior-inferior dichotmy is very western .

>>1195971

That sounds like something an inferior would say

>>1195973
It's all relative.

>>1195697
Easterners did not birth Marx so East.

File: 1437014210367.png (126KB, 1346x1754px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1346x1754px

>>1195697

>>1195697
>soul
>eastern

>western
>individual
kek

Generalizations dont do well.