What does /his/ think of Evidentialism i.e. the philosophy that

Lol do you mean logical positivism?

It's dog shit, bourgeois epistemology

>>1189460
>Are there any good arguments for anti-evidentialism?
Does self-evidence counts as evidence?

>>1189585
No, he clearly said evidentialism, you cretin.

>>1189460
Oh Sam...

File: 1460704410297.png (386KB, 784x569px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 784x569px

But why does a belief require evidence to be valid? what makes evidence necessary?

>>1189585
>Lol do you mean logical positivism?
Are you a fucking retard?

>bourgeois
Well that answers that.

File: 1463796464453.jpg (76KB, 581x567px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 581x567px

>>1190433

>>1189460
Logically there's no other option.

Unfortunately most people refuse to think logically.

File: 40keks.jpg (15KB, 292x257px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 292x257px

>>1189460
>anti-evidentialism
literally 'muh feelings,' the philosophy