Why modern united arab nation project failed?

because arabs are neither united or modern nation.

File: Sad clown.jpg (6KB, 251x211px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 251x211px

>>1177277
>Pan-THING$

>>1177288
This. Arabs are very tribal and they don't have the infrastructure or economic development to make the union beneficial to regional interest.

Its crazy really. Europe has less in-common then most Arab states but money talks.

>>1177292
I always wish Pan-Latinism or Romanism was a thing. France could have done it, if the shitty 2nd Empire didn't help Unite Italy.

>>1177297
Yeah, let's unite France with Romania.

>>1177312
Romania is a major francophile state. Why everybody gotta pick on them?

File: 1445552075142.jpg (89KB, 630x376px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 630x376px

>>1177277

Because Arabs are uncivilized swine, gentile.

>>1177323
I'm watching my wallet right now, Mihai, no funny moves.

>>1177277
Syria and Egypt don't even share a fucking border.

>>1177323
Nobody wants gypsies. I understand romanians don't want them either, because I happen to know some actual ethnic romanians, but the country is plagued.

File: sad-romanian-peasant-deep-in-thoughts.jpg (76KB, 370x556px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 370x556px

>>1177340

File: voltaire.png (71KB, 391x400px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 391x400px

The Modern United Arab Nation is neither modern, nor united, nor Arab, nor a nation.

File: RomanceLanguages.png (316KB, 799x523px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 799x523px

>>1177297
add a catholic clause and a capital in Toulouse and we can talk

>>1177277
>United
>Arab
>Nation

None of them are even Arab or in Arabia.

>>1177381
It's pretty arab, Voltaire.

>>1177288
This. Considering that arab as a nationality was a mistake.

File: The+weeping+Frenchman%2C+1940.jpg (223KB, 1500x1211px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 1500x1211px

>>1177385

>>1177385
>Romania
I don't understand how this happened.

File: Arabian_Peninsula_(orthographic_projection).png (399KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

399KB, 2000x2000px

>>1177390
Then why is no country in the Arabian Peninsula included?

>>1177607
napoleon.

>>1177277
Because they were too far and because he was Cairocentric

>>1177642
Because this was an association and the sultans of Arabian Peninsula didn't want to join

>>1177277
Because the only thing that has historically worked to unite the arabs is a dominant Sunni political entity in predominately Sunni lands.

>>1177607
Roman conquest of Dacia

>>1177277
they got BTFO by the Jews

>>1177277
>modern
>united
>nation

>>1177277

>religious strife between sunnis and non-sunnis muslims + muslims and nonmuslims
>CIA & friends overthrowing or trying to overthrow many secular Arab dictators
>Israel being a big impediment to their plans and a distraction
>most of the rural non-urban Arab world (and much of the urban Arab world) wants an Islamic government anyway

>>1177277
jews

>>1177607
For a while, much of Europe was Latinate.

Historical circumstance allowed one larger group of Romano-Dacians to keep their culture and language across the centuries. Eventually, post-WW1 shenanigans allowed these people to own massive amounts of clay in Eastern Europe

>>1178930
>post-WW1

The kingdom of Romania existed since 1881 and it's predecessor states since medieval times.

>>1177385
Obviously it would have to be in Rome. The city of Rome is the source of the romantic languages.

File: Voltaire.jpg (189KB, 831x1000px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 831x1000px

>>1178554
Here let me help you with that.

>>1177277
just like always -- major powers messing shit up

>>1177642
Arab =/= Arabian

The problem with pan-Arabism is that no Arab leader wants/wanted to give up power in order to facilitate pan-Arabism. Instead you have a bulk of countries which claim to be pan-Arab yet see each other as potential rivals.

Language is also a problem. I have an Iraqi friend who said that he found it very difficult to understand Egyptian Arabic whilst Libyan Arabic was like a completely different language to him.