Can a Knight/Warrior/Whatever wield a Two-handed sword while

>>1089161
this seems like a /k/ thread
also bastard swords

File: kn.png (463KB, 1889x935px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 1889x935px

>>1089164
>this seems like a /k/ thread
if you look closely, it's actually a /v/ thread

File: large_A10_249.jpg (248KB, 1339x1920px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1339x1920px

>>1089161

yeah sure why not they where not that heavy.

Its also fucking stupid, technically you could also go into battle duel wielding halberds but you never see a knigger doing that.

'Greatswords' in general where a niche as fuck weapon, the drain on your stamina having a greatsword and a shield at once is not worth the questionable gain of doing so. Making a sword a bit larger and heavier doesn't magically let it go through armour, it would still remain pretty shit at dealing with armoured opponents like all swords.

File: MacedonianPhalangite2.jpg (48KB, 640x408px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 640x408px

>>1089161

Soldiers in a Macedonian phalanx would hold their spears with both hands and wore a shield hung from the neck.

>>1089161
It's possible but it would be unwieldy, either way be the time two handed swords became popular, shields were mostly on their way out.

>>1089161
Not effectively.

>>1089164
Not a real thing.

>>1089161
The question really is why would you do it ?
You could do it, but in melee, with a greatsword, offense really is best defense, you have so much reach that a shield would just impair your big swings, thus giving you less offense and in fact not giving you that additional defense, since the swings effectively protects you.
As for projectiles, if used in warfare, you would probably use the greatsword as a shock troop and those had typically very high-end armor that would render you pretty much impervious to arrows and even big crossbows or musket balls. If you use a greatsword as a bodyguard, you'd probably have some level of armor plus being attacked by guns and missile weapons is much less likely.

A shield and a greatsword is too redundant really, as the big slashy reach is enough. If you want reach and shield, you'd have to go with rapier and buckler / rotella, but that's about it.

>>1089179
You were right. This turned into a Dark Souls discussion practically immediately.

>>1089161
That's Grutte Pier's sword; a Frisian pirate/freedom fighter, who would board a ship and swing that big ol' thing around - cleaving bitches and taking names. He didn't really bother with an extra shield, because it wouldn't serve any purpose during a boarding action.

File: 12009793_10207992057223673_2521999689762522727_n.jpg (8KB, 235x175px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 235x175px

theres no reason to wield greatsword and a shield. you would have no speed and no stamina, might as well unscrew the pommel and throw it at the enemy