>Mimetic theory explains the role of violence in human culture using imitation as a starting point. Human imitation is not static but leads to escalation and is the starting point for innovation. Girard’s great insight was that imitation is the source of rivalry and conflict that threatens to destroy communities from within. Because we learn everything through imitation, including what to desire, our shared desires can lead us into conflict. As we compete to possess the object we all want, conflict can lead to violence if the object cannot be shared, or more likely, if we refuse to share it with our rivals.
>Girard believes that early in human evolution, we learned to control internal conflict by projecting our violence outside the community onto a scapegoat. It was so effective that we have continued to use scapegoating to control violence ever since. The successful use of a scapegoat depends on the community’s belief that they have found the cause and cure of their troubles in this “enemy”. Once the enemy is destroyed or expelled, a community does experience a sense of relief and calm is restored. But the calm is temporary since the scapegoat was not really the cause or the cure of the conflict that led to his expulsion. When imitation leads once again to internal conflict which inevitably escalates into violence, human communities will find another scapegoat and repeat the process all over again.
Thoughts?
>>1007181
I think he's spot on. The interesting question this raises it: what should we project our violence on, if not a (racial/cultural other) scapegoat?
>>1007195
>The interesting question this raises it: what should we project our violence on, if not a (racial/cultural other) scapegoat?
Aliens
>>1007181
A brillant theory.
>>1007181
>evopsych
into the trash it goes
>>1007216
>tripfaggot
Discarded
>>1007195
Videogames
Basically, memes are literally responsible for wars?
>>1007223
Not much news there.
i believe in his theory. It does better than joseph campbells theories on mythology.