Hazmat Suits ?

>>792728
i think it looks pretty stupid lol

but to each their own

>>792728
If the prepers are right, we're going to have to get used to this.

That's taking safe sex to a ridiculous new extreme.

>>792869

I thought it would be the exact opposite of safe sex myself.

You can't get herpes

Well I'd like to see how much more interesting it could make facials.

File: 15862375482_5b4924788a_o.jpg (112KB, 680x1024px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 680x1024px

>>792863

That reminded me of this.

That not what I meant by "Rubber fetish", Angie...

It's fucking idiotic how some people focus on the risk of viral transmission to the exclusion of almost everything else.

Granted, I myself am guilty of narrowly focusing on the traumatic risks of anal sex, but that's mostly because so few others do. It's all "ZOMG HIV! ZOMG HERPES! WEAR FUCKING CONDOMS AND HAZMAT SUITS ZOMG!!1 AAAAIIIIIDDDDDSSSSSS!!!!!! BRRAAAAAAAIIIIINNNNNNNZZZZZZZ!!!!" (Sorry, got a bit carried away there)

Sure, some viruses can lead to life-long problems... But isn't ending up with a colostomy bag from too much destructive anal sex significant as well?

>>793231
>because so few others do.

No, everyone does. Traumatic anal sex is traumatic. It requires no discussion because the body already has a built-in warning system for it: pain.

People talk about STDs because there is no obvious warning sign to stop transmission until it's far too late.

File: 20120707 (15).png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

To be honest I was more inclined toward the "fun" aspect of it than the "safety" aspect.

Plus its not any safer. If anything its probably the exact opposite.

>>793241
Way to go, anon. I hadn't intended to turn this into yet another anal debate.

Anyway. No, everyone doesn't. I've seen numerous articles about anal sex that focus mostly or completely on the risk of disease transmission and downplay or even ignore the traumatic risks. Ignorance of these risks is certainly a problem, and there is plenty of misinformation out there as well.

> It requires no discussion because the body already has a built-in warning system for it: pain.
1. The sensitive anoderm is only about 1.5cm in length, beyond which the rectum is lined by a much more fragile columnar epithelium that lacks sensitive nerve fibers.
2. Painful anal sex is not uncommon. Some receptive people ignore pain, believing it to be normal and/or insignificant, while some others actually desire pain (sexual masochism). Coercion by partners who wish to emulate what they see in porn is a problem also.

> Traumatic anal sex is traumatic.
Not all of the traumatic consequences are immediately obvious.

>>793276
> Painful anal sex is not uncommon.
"Anal sex is becoming increasingly prevalent among heterosexual women and men. Although pain related to receptive anal intercourse is not uncommon, little is known about its phenomenology. This article aims to assess the prevalence and correlates of pain during anoreceptive intercourse, including anodyspareunia, its most severe form, among young women... The findings that a substantial proportion of women reported pain at first and subsequent anoreceptive intercourse highlight a need for more information and education about anal eroticism."
Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. 2011; 37(5): 346-58.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21961443
Should we take anodyspareunia seriously? A descriptive analysis of pain during receptive anal intercourse in young heterosexual women.

Get out of here, stalker!

>>793220

It still counts.

File: 1979-02-g.jpg (222KB, 1200x778px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1200x778px

>>793302

>>793276
>I hadn't intended to turn this into yet another anal debate.

Then why are you still posting? Just stop already.

>>793276

>I hadn't intended to turn this into yet another anal debate.

Is that the debate of the century around this board or something ?

what is even going on in these pictures?

moar pls

>>795242

> moar pls

Of which ?

>>795218

In which set of pictures ?

As someone in a hazmat response field. I can safely tell you that she is sweating her tits off in that thing.

>>796646

Is it really that hot inside one ?

cheeki breeki

>>794028
*Like*

when your bae has ebola

>>797036

For that matter is it comfortable inside one ?

>>797182
>when your bae has ebola

nice.

>>796646

Is it really that bad ?

Fuck this board
Seriously, fuck this fucking board

>>798845

Whats wrong with this board ?

>>792729
freaky dansker...

>>799633

If you're going to do something might as well pull out all the stops.

>>799633

Dansker ?

File: 284878__pisma.mertvogo.cheloveka.dvdrip.vicpryl_023010_06_24_38_.jpg (67KB, 720x544px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 720x544px

>>794028

Someone said "tarkovsky"? Lopushansky!

Im just imagining TF2's pyro going MMPH MMMPH MPPHPPHM MPHH MMPH

>>800609
Danish people.

>>800884

I think there is already porn specifically of that now that you mention it.

>>800765
That's Dead man's letters correct?


Was gonna do a paper on that film but Jesus, its obscure as hell

>>801025

Odd name for a film.

//ALL HALT//
Current subjects display numerous counts flagrant errors in use of protective garment
Current subjects display numerous counts of flagrant disregard for use of protective garment
Multiple garment breaches detected
Multiple respiratory breaches detected
Probability of infection approaching 100%

//ALL PERSONNEL BE ADVISED//

Suggested course of action:
Detain and quarantine.

If not possible Kill On Sight.

If not possible shut down facility and contain out break.

//RESUME WITH YOUR DUTIES//

>>802358

Does it get that serious ?

>>802539
//PRIVATE MESSAGE//
remember previous incidents of outbreak at our sister facilities

Remember that these protocols exist for your safety

//RESUME WITH YOUR DUTIES//

>>802358

>garment breaches detected

I'm wondering how you would even detect that.

>>802843
Nanomachines.

>>800765
>>794028
>>797114
>>801025
>>801855
why are there so many people who like tarkovsky on here

>>803193

>tarkovsky

Maybe he is a skilled director and film producer ?

>>802924

I see.

When you're making meth in the middle of nowhere and horny...

>>805679

Breaking Bad then ?

>>806890

So..whats going on in that image exactly ?

>>808150
Your guess is as good as mine. I guess I can see why people like this stuff, but to me it's basically a shittier version of latex wear.

>>808790
What you've never got turned on from playing S.T.A.L.K.E.R.? Nothing gets me harder than hearing "cheeki-breeki" as I'm walking through an abandoned factory.

>>792728
get out of here stalker

snapchat me

craman101

hairy dicks pls

>>808790

I find it more interesting than basic latex as it seems thicker.

>>808813
>>809318

What is "stalker" ?

>>809673

So whats going on there exactly ?

>>813474
Pyro's trying to figure out how to give a blowjob while still keeping the mask on.

>>814257

It's always nice to have protection.

>>810453

Always wondered, how do you do this without running out of air normally ?

>>792728

Not sure where porn of this would be found at.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ob70ZPWmPd8&oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dob70ZPWmPd8&has_verified=1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5o634zzcaHM&oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D5o634zzcaHM&has_verified=1

>>792728
The thoughts are that exchange of bodily fluids may be completely devised the point of a HazMat suit. But whatever gets you off man.

>>822509

Not like you'd probably think.

>>822509

>that exchange of bodily fluids may be completely devised the point of a HazMat suit.

Since when?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0_Wyg9DqIc

>>824846

Hand Job protection?

File: hazmat.jpg (609KB, 1728x3072px) Image search: [Google]

609KB, 1728x3072px

>>832473
Sorry, I'll never do it again...

>>835609

Well that was funny.

>>835609

It took me a moment to get that.

A нy, чики-бpики и в дaмки!

>>836679

What ?

>>836679
MUSGHIKI, NE STRELYAITE!

>>839356

There a joke I'm missing here?

>>836679
Пoтoм oнa мacлинy cлoвит.

>>839548

If you say so.

Why is this a thing?Hazmat suits really?

>>842287

Apparently there is a fetish for it.

>>842287

>Why

Because it is apparently.

>>792738
That suit is never going to work with a hole in the crotch like that!

>>843664

Well it might if you plan on taking multiple facials at least.

>>843664

Does it need to?

File: 1431741665711.jpg (499KB, 959x752px) Image search: [Google]

499KB, 959x752px

I dun understnad

>>847193

Do you need to?

>>843664

What if it works as intended?

>>796646

This. I can think of nothing less appealing than fucking in a haz mat suit.

>>849558

I find it quite appealing myself.

>>843872

I want to see this now.

>>851433

Who wouldn't?

>>851433

50 guys and 1 girl in a hazmatsuit?

>>854797

She probably wouldn't be able to get her suit's zipper open afterwards.

>>856251

Or get the flap on the side open.

>>858065

Stuck in it then?

>>799633
How do you know they're danish? Are you perhaps in this picture?

>>860563

Is that what "Dankster" means?

>>859949

Or cum on the inside, make her wear it and then tape it up so she can't get out.

>>864609

Mmmmm.

>>803193
theyre all the same user samefagging the thread

Wow I'm surprised this thread has been around this long.

>>868642

So am I.

>>803193

>tarkovsky

Maybe there is a fetish for him?

Weird stuff here but to each their own :-)

>>812234
its a post apocalyptic video game