Upcoming Releases

File: c934211sample2.jpg (293KB, 640x720px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 640x720px

>>4476166

File: c934211sample7.jpg (269KB, 640x720px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 640x720px

>>4476167

File: c934211sample8.jpg (210KB, 640x720px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 640x720px

>>4476168

File: c934211sample11.jpg (332KB, 640x720px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 640x720px

>>4476169

>>4476166
the previous 3 eps did so i have full confidence they will :)

>>4476166
They will , even though episode 3 is not my cup of tea it was still quite good. The girl from episode 2 is still the best.

>>4476171
Sauce on this?

>>4476897
The sheer retardation of saucefags never ceases to amaze me.

the guy was fat in the manga. dunno why they decided to make him in shape in the anime. i prefer the guy being gross. makes it more demeaning.

Just keep Queen Bee away from it and we're golden.

>>4477393
I hope Queen Bee accidentally draws Mohammad in one of their movies so ISIS gets a reason to bomb them.

She's cute and has nice tiddays. I look back through my old ero anime and there are tons of characters with boobs that size but these days seems most whio aren't loli have balloon tits. Or maybe I just don't watch much new stuff.

Er, anyway. Hopefully the animation is as decent as in previous epiisodes.

>>4476166
What kind of ghost is she?

We have Hanako of the toilet, Sadako of the tape, and the Hachisaku-sama. What's her major malfunction?

>>4479045
Fuck yeah. Maybe they'll title it "Boku no Goat Sex" or some shit like that. It's a netorare featuring Mohammad, his child wife, and a goat.

source?

>>4482439
Your fucking mom u piece of shit

>>4479045
>>4477393

>Queen Bee stays the closest to the original source
>They deserve to be bombed!!

You guys are hilarious. Also very hypocritical. While complaining about how Queen Bee ruins the original source. You guys praise titles that completely change the art style and they only have good animation going for it.

Already searched for google and iqdb and got nothing

>>4486338
If people wanted them to stay close to the original source they'd read the original source. Not watch a poorly animated, ```animated``` porno that only vaguely looks like the original anyway.

>>4486338
If people wanted a motion comic then they would purchase that. Not an sub thirty-minute, panels locked by time instead of progressing by user interaction, OVA.

>>>4487112

This is an animation. It still provides a different experience. I'm sorry but is manga hands free? Does it have voice acting? Sound effects? Movements? Oh wait, It doesn't. There's a reason why Queen Bee is still going and its because there's a market. People like it.

>>>4487220
But there isn't any motion comic for the titles Queen bee did. The animations are cheap. They get what they got for the price and they get to see their favorite artists' work move. This is the closest they can get so people will get it and the fact that they're still making animations with a lot popular artists tells you that their style has a market. The things you said aren't even an argument to my point.

You going on about your own preference doesn't counter how you are being a hycroite. Don't even add "if people" when the fact that Japanese consumers are buying the animation already proves you wrong. Go on, tell me why people buy Queen Bee's animations? Why is it more and more animations being made by Queen Bee?

>>4487237
>But there isn't any motion comic for the titles Queen bee did.

Exactly, there should be instead.

>The animations are cheap.

Just as cheap as a motion comic.

>They get what they got for the price and they get to see their favorite artists' work move.

They can get all that with a motion comic.

>This is the closest they can get so people will get it and the fact that they're still making animations with a lot popular artists tells you that their style has a market.

Wrong, a motion comic is closer. A market exists because, as you pointed out, it is cheap.

>The things you said aren't even an argument to my point.

Actually you have provided my argument for me, like a cuck offering me his wife. Thanks!

>>4487262
So, speaking your own preference how you would prefer a motion comic or how you rather read the original source is all of a sudden an argument. Okay. How does what you say or what I said all of a sudden make you not a hypocrite for talking about the original source being butchered when the thing you like does the exact same but worse.

>>4487262
Not the mention that you actually think Queen Bee's animations are actual Motion comic when they aren't. Motion comics provide different experience. You interact with the panel and it moves. It requires you click at all times and its incredibly not fap friendly. There's no sound or actual animation in play.

When people buy Queen Bee's works. They don't expect it to be like a motion comic but to be an animation format of their favorite artists' nor do they expect a perfect adaption. It just stays more closer to the original source compared to other titles that sacrifices the art for animation but it just does the opposite. Its a preference for people and a style. For you not to understand is incredibly. I love how you moved the goalpost when I originally was talking about other animations ruining the art to talking about motion comics and reading the original content. Its completely irrelevant and just you forcing your preferences on me.

>>4486338
>Implying staying "closest to the original source" means literally taking a page from the original manga and animating it into a few half-assed frames.

U wot m8

>>4488726
Are you pretending to be retarded? Yes, thats what it actually means. Do you seriously think studios that butcher the art stay closer to the original than a studio that actually uses the pages from a manga keeping their art and work intact while giving full credit to the original artist?

When you're animating the pages, you just can't add a lot of frames. Its just the limits of their style. Go enjoy your nudist beach adaption by pineapple or Poro. They totally stay closer to the original. Or how about Murakami? You get a nice drunken camera filter.

>>4488883
You are the same retard from the hate thread right? understand that taking a page from a manga and making shitty 5 fps loops is just shitty animation

>>4490195
Can you stop pretending to be retarded?

>>4476166
How many episodes are they doing?
Not a fan of shota in ep3, this one looks better

>>4476166
Will Hentai KyoAni deliver again?

How do they do this? What is their magic,

>I wanted to see that
>I got asked in jap-lingo if i'm 18
>I randomly pressed an answer and hope it was a yes
>It was
>they put even moar jap-lingo in the site
>I don't understand two things
>Jack and shit
How can i watch dis?
What should i press?

>>4496613
Release Date: 2017/01/20
And you wait for the dvd-rip (usually takes 1 day)

>>4496617
Thanks m'brah