Cross Eyed Images

File: 1407492025756.jpg (476KB, 2077x1046px) Image search: [Google]

476KB, 2077x1046px

Posting a few to get the thread started.

File: 1335504893429.jpg (227KB, 800x512px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 800x512px

This one's small, but the 3d is really good.

File: 1466064446897.jpg (1MB, 2960x1997px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2960x1997px

last one for now.

File: 1460400531947.jpg (607KB, 996x1600px) Image search: [Google]

607KB, 996x1600px

Also have this guide if anyone wants to know ow to make this. In the previous thread some people discussed a method one making it in blender, but not in detail.

Are all these images cross-eyed and not parallel?

>>4322181
Why don't you try it out?

But yes they are all cross eye.

File: ahri_screen_blender.png (466KB, 1305x745px) Image search: [Google]

466KB, 1305x745px

>>4322178
Explain it in detail will need a lot more than a simple picture.

Here is the actual quote about using Blender :
"The way I did that was to act like you gonna make a hybrid animation (or puppet animation if you like). From that, I have different body part on different layers.
Once done, I import those layer using a personal script and, instead of applying the texture in a regular way, I use a virtual projector placed on the same location/rotation than the camera.
From that, you can use the edit tool to generate basic depth and sculpt tool to add a bit of volume and rounded shape on your layers (like breast and thick legs).

I suppose you can skip the layering part using a single picture with some depth but it's better to get at least 3 layer (background, body and breast) in order to get some basic acceptable results."

I made the stereoscopic pictures that was done using Blender (and also animations) but I'm too lazy to explain.

These things always fuck up my vision after I adjust to them. I have trouble getting back to "normal" vision and have to do shit like closing one eye to read.

File: 1460841896344.png (4MB, 1445x1200px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1445x1200px

>>4324598
That happened to me the first few times I did them for a long while. Like any sort of training it goes away with practice.

File: 1451516991392.png (3MB, 2824x2000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2824x2000px

/r/ing this.

File: 1335577689456.jpg (271KB, 880x736px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 880x736px

>>4324923
>>4324924
>>4324958
These ones are not 3d, did you even check them before posting?

File: xjchnsxchjn.png (200KB, 800x240px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 800x240px

>>4322154
from a QR from the other thread

bump for interest

>>4322154
Is this shit bad for the eyes? I don't want to damage these balls of joy.

>>4326492
Haven't found any evidence for it; you're just using a muscle so you can strain it too much, so take breaks while you're practicing.

If you're still worried try researching and tell us what you find.

>>4326556
>>4326492
As long as wind doesn't blow while your eyes are crossed, you'll be safe. You need to be careful because if wind blows on your eyes while they're crossed, they'll be stuck like that.

>Fapping while cross-eyed

Boy I can see it now.

File: 1468395192632.webm (278KB, 1620x1178px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 1620x1178px

>>4326492
>>4326556
>>4326568
not any of these anons but still..

eye is indeed a muscle mass (6 muscles total) that as any muscle if you use it on non-normal states (such as crossing eyes in this case) it will have some normal side-effects...that include muscle-pain, dysfunctionality of the muscles (mainly small twitching for the eyes) BUT ALL OF THEM WILL BE GONE IN AN HOUR OR SO

and of course in order to get to that point you need to cross eye for at least 20-30 mins without any break

there, you decide

eyes getting stuck is just a humorless myth just like the boogie monster (mainly for similar reasons as you can imagine)

heres my contribution tho

>>4326618
There was a fuckin' comic or some shit that an anon made in regards to how ridiculous fapping while cross-eyed would look. I didn't save it but if anyone else could post it that'd be great

>>4326664

File: 1460313829326.jpg (67KB, 1173x723px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1173x723px

>>4326664

>>4326492
Raise your finger right in front of your face. Focus on it. Notice everything in the background doubles.

Your eyes are now in the same position as when you're crossing them to view an image. The only difference is your brain (?) is sending different signals to control the contraction of other muscles that control bringing an object into focus relative to its distance. Signals it's being tricked into sending.

>>4326719
Hey, whatever gets the deed done.

File: pokegirl_BTS.webm (2MB, 1364x768px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1364x768px

>>4322881
>>4326621
Bump with a boner killer

>>4331471
That looks like an insane ammount of work

>>4332377
Yes and no. Doing stereoscopic conversion is always a good amount of work.

Like on >>4322178 , there's this annoying layering part you had to do. But instead of doing the depth effect on photoshop, I tried to use Blender for that part. Why ? Simply because I don't know how to get the good depth on PS.

Once done, since everything was polygons, I tried to animate it using bones and TADA... here it is. FYI, that was one of my first work on stereoscopy conversion and I've done much better since (but only /aco/).

>>4331471
if anything that gave me way more appreciation for the works that go into these.

Who the heck is that <3 ???!

So I can get the two images to become one in my vision, but it is always blurry. I've been told to just relax my eyes but I just can't get it to be clear. Any suggestions?

File: 14676986857.gif (118KB, 900x800px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 900x800px

>>4332902
Try it with smaller (less wide) stereoscopic images, it should be easier on those, then you can do it on the other ones by practicing only slightly larger ones.

>>4332917
Oh I forgot to mention, you could try zooming out on the existing posts instead of trying to find new smaller ones.

>>4322162
she succ good?

uh whats the point to this?

>>4332959
Cross your eyes for a neat image and trying to wack off at the same time actually takes skill.

File: shinecon vr.jpg (20KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 400x400px

>>4331471
You are a god, anon.
Also, seriously, stop crossing your eyes everyone and just buy a cardboard. I'm using your images with the cardboard and it looks awesome.
Here is my "cardboard"

I'm the cardboard guy. I'm here to rate your skills. I really appreciate your work. You are the best I've ever seen.
>>4322176
This one is a good image you picked, effects aren't that strong but are kind of good. Hard to see it's not 2d.
>>4322162
By far the best image you did overall. Good combination of "it's plausible that dick is yours" and image. The image itself is awesome and you did a very good effect in this one.
Real good 3D and the image is like it was made for it.
>>4322166
It's true, the 3d is good but image too low def. to be enjoyable.
>>4324926
Really good pic choice and effects, I like how you mae the inside of her vagina 3D too. The bad thing is the rest of her body is too much "in your face" I mean, her tits/face should be a little further. Still a good image, please do not stop making their insides 3d too.
>>4324927
For some reason I didn't really see the effect, I mean, I saw, but it was kinda weird.
>>4324955
By far the best 3D details ever.
The way you did the 3D in this one is completely AWESOME! Really, this picture is completely unbelievable, everything has it's own depth, you should look forward to make more pictures like this one where you make everything at it's own depth, It looks realist as fuck, it's a bit weird that her hands look too big but it isn't your fault as her hands are the correct depth too.
>>4324959
"Cool", has some 3d in her legs, head, raincoat(?) and everything, could really use different depth for her insides and butt. But I bet doing the butt perfectly is going to be a real pain , just the insides would make this pic way better.
>>4326621
Looks really good but I couldn't test it since my phone refused to loop the video and I couldn't enjoy it properly.

If you want anything on steam that is worth 2,72 or less just give me your steam link and I will gift for you.
Must prove you are op.
You can prove linking me a random print of you making another pic in this >>4331471 .

>>4324986
It's probably oc where they just thought the point was to get double porn.

File: 1456079891709.jpg (385KB, 2055x768px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 2055x768px

>>4334251
>buy a cardboard
Why would I spend money on this glorified viewmaster, when I can just cross my eyes?

>>4334287
For one this is not one single poster.
I'm the first three and just so you know I haven't ever made one of these.

>>4334441
How would they get double porn if they were the same picture side by side?

File: 2016-07-23 21-42-22-trimmed.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>>4334443
Indeed, that shit is for poor people. You should wait for SteamVR and Lighthouse to support custom devices and start saving up for Vive 2 as well as at least a couple of GTX 1080s. Unless you wanna develop now and, I admit, GameWorks technology is super fun.

Because the future is near, onii-chan.

>>4334463
I'd rather use my eyes. I should in theory be able to do the same thing in that video, just have it display differently.

I guess the one advantage those peripherals have over freeview is that they tilt with your head, so you can tilt your head and still see in 3d

>>4334464
Don't forget about ability to interact with your surroundings and receive haptic feedback.

I really envy your imagination if you can beat that.

im wondering when the first jumpscare will come with this cross eyed gifs and webms

>>4334443
Oh, sorry, then I'm willing to gift my absurd ammount of money to the guy who did >>4324955 or/and >>4326621 .
>>4334463
But I am "poor people".

>>4334750
Like that would phase anyone.

>>4334466
Right, I was simply talking about the context of the types of images ITT.

File: killLaKill_request_bis.webm (489KB, 1968x552px) Image search: [Google]

489KB, 1968x552px

>>4334754
I made the animated one but I don't plan to share my steam name to /h/.

Can anyone link me a tutorial on how to do this properly?
I mean the eye thing.

>>4334952
It's in the OP

File: crossEyeRequest.png (1MB, 1698x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1698x1200px

Bump

>>4334463
This is kinda funny. Did you do this? I'd love to see more of it, although less leg limps.

>>4334852
Can you do more? And may we /r/ something?

>>4334852
Can you do more? And may I /r/ something?

File: foxgirl.webm (496KB, 1700x1006px) Image search: [Google]

496KB, 1700x1006px

>>4336349
>>4336353
Sorry but that was some old works (A bit less than a year) and I don't plan making those anymore.

>>4336044
>>4326195
>>4324960
Moar Miku
Miku so good

can someone make a 3D of time travel shoujo mari waka

>>4337025
>foxgirl.webm
>foxgirl
>fox
This hurts me so much

>>4322156
This picture is awesome but the lack of at least her left nipple hurts badly. Could someone please edit it and put nipples on her? Or something hiding where her left nipple should be.

Are there any Crossed eyes Liru webms?

>>4341166
whoops
*crossed eyed

File: foxgirl_BTS.webm (3MB, 1364x768px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1364x768px

>>4340788
>Be me
>See a request from a /b/astard about making a cross eyed picture based on an image
>Be one of the few who can make a cross eyed animation
>Made a cross eyed animation
>Can't get the difference between a wolfgirl and a foxgirl
>Will continue to name the file "foxgirl" in order to make an other headache.

>>4341295
respect

>>4324959

I just had to know if the pussy was in 3d

yes

yes it was

>>4334463

>xavier renegade angel

>>4341295
Could you make a swapped edition next time too? I'm using a cardboard and in your method you use your left eye to see the right side of the pic and your right eye to see the left one and in the cardboard it's right eye for the right eye and left eye for the left side, which forces me to swap the pictures in photoshop to view the effect. I can easily do it with .jpgs and .pngs but sadly I can't enjoy .webms and .gifs since I don't know how to swap them.
If anyone knows anything about video/gif editing please tell me how to do it so I can do it myself.

>>4341942
Use a computer screen?

>>4342011
What?

>>4342195
I meant that you could just view it on a computer, but what you are trying to do can probably be done in adobe after effects.

>>4341942
Is there any Android/iOS app that can support cross eyed picture/video ?

>>4322154
wait so how do I do this? Just cross my eyes and hope the images match up?

>>4342835
Cross your eyes and you'll see the image double. Match it together in the middle of your vision, and try to look at details, and your eyes will focus on it properly.

>>4336044
Not sure if that's a poor anatomy clit or a piercing...

Nope, definitely a piercing.

>>4331471
>>4326621
>>4337025
>>4341295
Shit, I always thought these were made in After. You're amazing anon.

By the way, how hard to learn is Blender for someone who uses 3Ds Max? I'm already worried about paying license subs after my student one expires, and Autodesk is even more jewish than Adobe of all companies out there, that's why I'm looking for other options.

>>4343154
>Shit, I always thought these were made in After.
Most of hybrid/puppet animation are done using AE or Flash. They use 2D transformation only (rotation + translation) and sometime do some deformation in order to create some depth (mostly boobs "physics"). This method can create good animation but you can't (yet ?) do stereoscopy using it.

Stereoscopic pictures are done using PS, depthy.me (or any equivalent that using Z map) but you can't really do animation. I heard that some guy use some depth trick on depthy to create movement but it's actually incompatible with stereoscopy.

Here, Blender is used to do both animation and stereoscopy. I suppose any 3D program can be used to create that. Don't expect that to be an easy work through. I'm not the first one doing that : just search for "corradosgifs" on google.

>By the way, how hard to learn is Blender for someone who uses 3Ds Max?
Depend on you. Since you learnt 3DSMax, that's mean you have some knowledge about mesh, armature, animation, texturing, shader and other stuff. You have to teach how to use the UI (right click thing is kinda weird the first times you used it) and find the equivalent tool for everything you learn. You can change the regular shortcuts to the 3DSmax preset one if needed.

>I'm already worried about paying license subs after my student one expires, and Autodesk is even more jewish than Adobe of all companies out there, that's why I'm looking for other options.
Hmm... I suppose you plan to only do freelance or something like that right ? If you plan to work with big companies, you'll have some trouble since those only search for Maya, C4D or 3DSmax user because considered as "standard". Blender can sometime be used for (too) specific usage but don't really expect more.

File: 1386889142918.png (731KB, 1200x1040px) Image search: [Google]

731KB, 1200x1040px

>>4344084
>>4345060
>>4345512
If you're going to bump, at least post something.

>>4346942
I'm one of them and I didn't because I don't have any "new" pics.
Why don't you dump your collection? You might have some interesting stuff.

So when I use a pencil 3 images appear but I can't focus on the middle one. anyone got tips?

File: 1409659970738.jpg (596KB, 1605x600px) Image search: [Google]

596KB, 1605x600px

>>4347457
Eh fair enough. I just don't want to hog the whole thread when someone could post new stuff or find a new image that I don't have.

>>4347457
Do you mean that it's blurry or something else?

File: sterioscopic super sonico.jpg (73KB, 1194x800px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1194x800px

bump

File: 1338549243310.jpg (201KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 1024x768px

>>4347753
Better version.

>>4347578
Yes

>>4324888
It will take me HOURS, but I'm on it, it's actually quite fun.

File: cross eyed explination.png (18KB, 679x452px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 679x452px

>>4347988
Usually people have become accustomed to seeing things automatically. In order to view these cross eyed images optimally you have to practice with manually focusing and aiming your eyes until you can do the new routine automatically.

Normally your eyes focus so that wherever the focus point is not blurry. What you want to practice is being able to change focus of your eyes without moving the focus point, so that whatever is there is blurry.

If you're using the pencil method, you should be able to see the 3rd image in the background but blurry, try focusing your eyes so that the pencil becomes blurry while the background comes into focus, while still aiming your eyes at the pencil.

>>4347457
>>4348087
May I suggest removing the pencil after crossing the eyes and overlapping the 2 center images in one? It won't get in the way anymore.
As anon said, it's a matter of forcing your eyes/brain to focus on a different point than you're used to. It will take some practice, keep staring at the center unfocused image and it will slowly start to focus. Can't help more, sorry, I can just assure it will become automatic at some point.

>>4324598
crossing your eyes isn't a dangerous thing, you won't have any injury from it, however, if you cross your eyes for too long it will start to hurt, but even that isn't a big deal. in other words, your eyes are supposed to be able to cross, just like staring up or down, left or right..

if these things f*** up your vision, then you should stop seeing them, or see small-sized pictures.

>>4346942
artist?

>>4348434
Just paste it into mspaint then drag left to crop and run it through iqdb

Can anyone help? I have trouble seeing big cross eyed images like ones you would see on your computer screen. I have no trouble seeing them on the phone, but on my computer I find it really hard making the two images overlap.

>>4350453
Try moving further away from your monitor

File: miku_BTS.webm (2MB, 1364x768px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1364x768px

>>4336044
My last bump until this thread die. I tried to use the Cycles renderer but the viewport is quite weird to see.

File: blueGirl_BTS.webm (3MB, 1364x768px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1364x768px

>>4351578
Small bonus : also work for depthy.me stuff.

File: miku1.jpg (306KB, 2000x832px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 2000x832px

>>4351580
I don't think that one's been posted, would you mind posting it?

>>4351669
That was for a depthy thread. It wasn't meant to be used for stereoscopy directly.

File: vkqmIKp.jpg (127KB, 1200x864px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1200x864px

>>4351721
Ah, it would be a pain to make it for stereo I guess. Thanks for posting it anyway.

>>4341517
[theme tune plays]
Damn I love that show. Wish it could have gone on forever (ever ever ever).

>>4352187
That's not 3d.

>>4351721
Could you still deliver it? Im using depthy.

>>4351669
Her left shoulder is so far away from her head. Other than that it's a great pic.

>>4352187
>>/d/>>

God, i finally did it
i finally managed to see it
but everything is kinda blurry, is it normal ?

>>4353214
Supposed to be clear as day. Your eyes are too calm.

File: bluegirl+depth.png (989KB, 893x1014px) Image search: [Google]

989KB, 893x1014px

>>4352720
Here you go.

I know that there is problem on that area with left chest bones that is very annoying. Anyway, rate and criticize please.

File: secondtryafteraloongtime.jpg (188KB, 1810x1273px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1810x1273px

>>4353993
forgot image, it's this

what's the point of crossing your eyes?

>>4353998
so you can see the image with some 3D effect

>>4353214
Are you crossing them towards the nose or outwards?
I can instantly focus with the first method, which fortunately is the one all these pic are meant for.
Either way at first it takes time to focus. Try hard until you see the pic perfectly.
It may take you long minutes of staring at the same pic and slowly adjusting your eyes. But it'll take less and less time the more you try it.

>>4353995
Overall nice. Avoid using pictures where one tit goes to one random side and not closer to my face, it kinds of waste the whole meaning behind it.

>>4353995
In some places the hair in the background is closer than the actual body that is in front of it.

Some of the hair doesn't quite match up same with the left boob.

If you were going for super detail, the nipples don't quite show and the right boob isn't quite lined up with how the hand is squishing it.

I'd say that if it's only your second try you might want to start with something less detailed.

>>4354413
I kind of forgot the hair.
>start with something less detailed
doing this with an image you don't like is a torture, man

File: 601be250647e2a22d886fbe9f345f22e.png (3MB, 1024x2560px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1024x2560px

Now that's much above my level so I'll leave my recommendation here, I think turning an image like this to 3D would be awesome. You know why.

File: thirdtry.jpg (636KB, 1420x1000px) Image search: [Google]

636KB, 1420x1000px

>>4354670
Looks like playing wiith more than average depth makes images tiresome to look at, you need more than one focus to see most of the picture.

>>4322154
>http://www.angelfire.com/ca/erker/freeview.html http://starosta.com/3dshowcase/ihelp.html
This isn't working, could someone explain me the appeal of this?

>>4326492
I'm on my phone so i don't need to cross my eyes. I just defocus until the image is centered and clear.

File: c2979ad78899a1ef47fedda592ad8a7d752f05c3f7905725df31d24231458f4a.png (1MB, 1400x1401px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1400x1401px

I'll be posting my collection, can't remember if loli is allowed on this board or not, but I wont risk it

File: aeada086c391cae25f89e642f69cc4e4560853b355721cb0ab9f690c8733e0ca.png (2MB, 1547x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1547x1200px

>>4355497

File: f0616cec4ce74fbec7b7e5400e8f78b82cff40f1c9a1acf5cda2a0302bb1f33d.jpg (265KB, 1710x637px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1710x637px

>>4355498

File: 93a70aef55b2b21b77da504abbb995aebebbbe202362ae24b445b923a328b849.png (2MB, 1700x1239px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1700x1239px

>>4355510

File: 806c26ee44423b9bd05e1037bacdc165a93c46d6da63dd3b8387765b7db0aa71.jpg (269KB, 1541x768px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 1541x768px

>>4355511

File: d6eec33c1f6dddef786ee825e510fce873a302a49a1c12f2606c3873a36ed915.jpg (210KB, 1200x844px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 1200x844px

>>4355512

File: b5c90b9734b6b01bd4accc2427b02043942024d2d66b01c82123683a1e29a8ba.jpg (609KB, 1848x1200px) Image search: [Google]

609KB, 1848x1200px

>>4355515

File: 5d1efa536aa8384be8ead066adc05d26d98a6024d9a45583cb72d41fe8604de3.jpg (1MB, 1200x843px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x843px

>>4355516

File: 7da5c48615739585c8df9d16bfd47063cd0f29ead1621085aae52ed5dfc2c852.jpg (2MB, 2400x1775px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2400x1775px

>>4355517

File: 44aa20d50fc402c747fbe96cf36225caea5f65726875358d85f80c3b39cad6bf.jpg (308KB, 1730x900px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 1730x900px

>>4355518

File: a41d851f064a91fcff0d2f2c202777bbb492324ac0956f270d9b0346d8760700.jpg (47KB, 1200x723px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 1200x723px

>>4355521

File: e1a2c118361572646b90f42d8e5871c8106940f56741b4a91ed1fd1063b37da5.gif (2MB, 1114x800px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1114x800px

>>4355522

File: d592ee4ebc499e58ecf2e90d9ffd8640d7650ba58d4b82dde0059bdfab8ca2e6.jpg (515KB, 2560x720px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 2560x720px

>>4355523

File: 0385762837654987b32d15f1533ef6368030a3d4e34371dd29256ee0b89bab31.jpg (700KB, 3005x2000px) Image search: [Google]

700KB, 3005x2000px

>>4355524
I've got more, but the captchas are getting unruly. I'll post more later on.

File: 1407416310433.jpg (317KB, 1600x600px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 1600x600px

>>4355410
Sounds like you're doing parallel, doesn't everything seem reversed when viewing that way?

>>4355497
>can't remember if loli is allowed on this board or not, but I wont risk it
Would you mind posting a mega or linking to what you can't post? I don't think that's against the rules.

I've been practicing for a few days, and today I finally managed to see an image in 3D.

These images are great, thanks a lot.

But the problem I have now is that I can't keep it in 3D, after a second or two it goes back to blurry. Or when I start shaking from the fapping it gets blurry again. Any suggestions?

>>4355585
/r/ing the loli images, please!

>>4355527
Please do anon. These images are absolutely mind-blowing.

>>4355585
>Sounds like you're doing parallel, doesn't everything seem reversed when viewing that way?
not that guy but yes
a shame since I find it a lot less stressful for the eyes and the image appears to be bigger when viewed from the same distance
luckily one may simply invert the two images if he wants to use a different method and keep the perspective right

It only works for me when I'm really close to the screen. Is this how it's supposed to be or can pros do it from a distance?

File: d2cf84acaf5df1b5ca0b8a046e31c63ee8220c32104cab63586d17ab4168dd74.jpg (159KB, 1200x843px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1200x843px

>>4355527
I'm back, I've getting a link setup for the loli images.

File: 57b10c998b5b301905667bde76c7508ba9f36f9c48909ad4b04e92e5bc6b1fbf.jpg (136KB, 1205x850px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1205x850px

>>4355998

File: b690ebb11d2b6c3b1f6896ccd6e3ec4ccb3627f73d9bd0a9ca084b5964f26b6b.jpg (167KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1200x900px

>>4355999

File: 3bc41e8ab63595b2f8b1056993e73778492b02dd2ed563f673453e7e4ab815ed.jpg (189KB, 800x595px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 800x595px

>>4356009

File: 08bd43c3a1c134e96f86cdaf7a82cf6f68fd14a09e2c2572b11022f89f49c2d8.jpg (188KB, 1224x800px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1224x800px

>>4356012

File: c533682b100c6964605333c530f6c34e9e2c4f1210707fd405b132395406f590.jpg (87KB, 1200x448px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 1200x448px

>>4356014

File: 19871609a12522b8d6d6d2021432759b13b21682a343365e585d958f8a1ea14c.jpg (141KB, 1200x847px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1200x847px

>>4356016

File: 92f57d884f12bd8b4eff737c7b489346b9f8b5cea447f4409664720f2de70113.jpg (145KB, 1200x845px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1200x845px

>>4356017

File: 9d6fe779ce152163357fdccc388f0c8a79f87004b9ae05dc191dfa71a05bdf89.jpg (152KB, 1200x849px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1200x849px

>>4356018

File: a1bc5f148f89c64a63c5291ee8084ad36f4f2742f29e0a096e7a533d1a5f17c5.jpg (117KB, 1200x844px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1200x844px

>>4356056

File: 95255059e6fcbd948938f2eed79301c8a58e1e508963130473cb0bc2642f76f6.jpg (74KB, 1200x618px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1200x618px

>>4356059

File: c09e1b6471c0dde833e7f64e1d5d2e2cc0ea9866691586cc73b61823d03456a3.jpg (195KB, 1200x910px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 1200x910px

>>4356061

File: 927c7dd74dacf12910337948639b4962f51e493e3da03222f6b9c858024a9d06.jpg (105KB, 850x554px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 850x554px

>>4356067

File: b1c4114abb395f081f2897bed7cfac448c7cd30121e8cb48d5a8cb3b276b0a51.jpg (89KB, 1200x450px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 1200x450px

>>4356069

Same pictures... again

File: 0a04eb81fccea519ce1ea2e70d283e5bc14b2037acef961fe65ffd7a0fbd9a36.jpg (61KB, 1200x382px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1200x382px

>>4356072

>>4356073
Yeah... sorry not much new stuff is being made, although I've found a few new things that weren't in the previous thread.

File: 822f470148afbf359698b59f3935905e398218d92f752a46d997fe03474e6b2c.jpg (132KB, 1200x750px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1200x750px

>>4356076

>>4355869
Halp purease

Is a lot of cross required or only a little? Tips and pointer would be appreciated.

File: a4811fd7ed61ab553dfa55ff566acab08586c4d1ac033180b03a1254fd46f7f5.jpg (59KB, 1200x448px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1200x448px

>>4356078


>>4356140
Depends on the size of the image and how close to the screen you are. For example with >>4356076 you'd need to cross more than with >>4356009. As for tips what I used to do was cross pass the point of the images overlapping and slowly uncross to the convergence point. By the way if you're near sighted it may stay blurry, I just wear my glasses and it helps, although if your far sighted wearing your glasses will make it harder.

>>4356166
Sank yu

Who knew just one thread could give you a new fetish?

File: 0e2c65c45eccf459874e66a8b4a24da02dae1c5fe4e4cf0cd97dc4c381902984.jpg (559KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

559KB, 1000x750px

>>4356166

I'm going to be taking requests for a bit, currently working on >>4324888. If you want something done post it and I may get around to it

File: 1468474211647.jpg (770KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

770KB, 1200x1600px

request ^

File: anubis2.jpg (258KB, 850x1300px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 850x1300px

>>4356283
I'd like either this one or for you to give a crack at >>4354670

>>4356166
Thanks for the dump, anon.

File: wiprequest.png (3MB, 2400x1600px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2400x1600px

>>4356352
I could do a bit more cleaning up with this, if you want, but it's done for now.

Going to start on the anubis although I swore I've seen it done somewhere before.

File: 12.jpg (169KB, 850x1202px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 850x1202px

Requesting this.

>>4356283
I feel like this image might be really underrated. I have little to no interest in feet but damn does that look like a very inviting opening. Buckets.

Bump?

>>4358561
>>4359155
/h/ is a slow board, no need to bump it so often

These stereo pix are pretty easy to set up in a program like Daz, but not for converting existing images.

You just need to render the scene from two slightly offset cameras.

However, the ones I've done aren't /h/.

>>4359709
Link? Or maybe to a thread where you can post them?

Is Centorea too /d/???

>>4359207
I don't want this thread to go tho. I just found this stuff..

Any full videos of 2d hentai, all I've found are a couple 3d models and 3d gap hero's

>>4360293
Only the bottom half, if it's cropped it should be no problem.

>>4324955
Holy fuck the 3d on this insane

>>4336044
Can u post please moar femdom from wokada or something similar?

>>4363479
fastfix
pov femdom

>>4343154
3d modelling is the important bit, software is just the tool. In industry they will expect you to switch and learn the new one within a month, if not a couple weeks.

File: corrupted miku.png (149KB, 800x240px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 800x240px

>>4344730
From this QR code

>>4364476
I feel bad for people who play games at this resolution

File: Untitled-1.gif (3MB, 1600x836px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1600x836px

Here

>>4322154
How the fuck do these things even work?

File: 1279633785077.jpg (167KB, 1180x800px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1180x800px

>>4366699
http://www.angelfire.com/ca/erker/freeview.html http://starosta.com/3dshowcase/ihelp.html

Please read the OP.

How far away from the screen are you when viewing these pics?
I never get the hang of "sharpening the images" in my mind. They always look really small and blurry floating in the air midway to the screen.

>>4366879
when you cross your eyes to look close your brain tricks you into thinking its twice as far away/smaller.

its really annoying.

File: 800px-Focus_in_an_eye.svg.png (36KB, 800x270px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 800x270px

>>4366882
The brain doesn't trick us. It's us who try to trick our brains.
When I cross my eyes, they also automatically changes the curvature of the lens.

Let's say you're looking at an image from half a meter away.
You cross your eyes and your brain assumes the object you're looking at is 10 centimeters away so it adjusts the lens accordingly but since it's actually 50 centimeters it becomes blurry.

Any sages here who have perfected the art of stereoscopic image viewing? How long did you have to train?

>>4366895
its called the 3ds and training time is zero minutes.

>>4366901
It's kinda expensive though, reason why threads are separated.

The problem with the cross eyed method is that one of the double is higher than the other so they cant superpose

>>4366895
It workes for me after about 1 minute. I just sort of adjusted my eyes, and they became clear. Also, I don't have my glasses on rn, , and I can see the cross-eyed middle part of the image clearer and more crisp than I see it normally.

File: 2.jpg (277KB, 1721x1200px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 1721x1200px

>>4366975
>I don't have my glasses on
Whoa, that could be the answer: GLASSES!

Why did I never think of that? Just wear glasses for short sighted people. It so obvious.
thankyouthankyouthankyouthankyou

>>4366895
Focus in just one part of the picture, like an eye, and try to align the "two eyes" together, sometimes you need to turn your head to get the pictures perfectly aligned

File: 1273537193497.jpg (97KB, 1200x480px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1200x480px

I got a huge collection. I'll dump them someday in a new thread.

>>4367717
Sounds good, thanks for contributing.

>>4355998
It's been a fortnight, where's that link?

>>4366895
I generally just crosseye until I can get the 3d, then hold it and back up while holding the crosseye until it becomes clear

It seems to work pretty well, I'm brand new to cross eye but I've been crossey-ing patterns since I was little, I don't think it's a time thing though

I think it might depend on what you're using, I use a 7inch tablet, but it might be harder for monitors. Lemme try on a monitor, it might yield different results.

File: less noise.jpg (911KB, 1720x1200px) Image search: [Google]

911KB, 1720x1200px

>>4367005

>>4368154
It's easier the smaller distance you have to "move" the pictures, cause you don't have to move you eyes inwards so much. It doesn't specifically matter what size of a screen you use, what matters more is the distance at which you're looking at the pics.

>>4322154
The moving puzzles on that spot the difference site nearly gave me a fucking stroke. Also it's just unfair when you reach lime green and they start mirroring the two images, but I guess you aren't supposed to be viewing them crosseyed in the first place.

>>4366696
And this has no depth, its just the same gif twice isn't it? When you think about how you'd need to edit each frame it makes sense it's nearly impossible. A false prophet.

>>4366895
It is actually just about being actively aware of the muscles that do it (even if you don't know it) when you learn. I never ever thought about it, looked at some cross eyed fap threads like a year and a half ago. Then came back a long time later and could do it easily. Now, depending on how well the image is actually made I can do it in less than a second and switch back in just the same time.

>>4331471
What is this? And how this works?

>>4371924
It is highly advanced 3D editing software, animators use it to make 2D animation look a bit less 2D

How to see this pictures "3d" without crossing eyes? That shit doesn't work for me and hurts my eyes

>>4372731
You got a Nintendo 3DS? The screen is kinda shitty but it's basically the answer to your question.
>>4314207

>>4348074
Glad to hear, take your time no rush.

>>4372220
That post basically explain... nothing that the video itself show. Plus, the term "highly advanced 3D editing software" means nothing as is.

>>4371924
Well...

>>>4372220
It's just blender.

>>4373633
I love how we go from "highly advanced 3D editing software" to "just blender".

>>4324986
And here I was thinking it was just some kind of cross eyed magic. But damnit, you're right.

I figured it out after like 15 minutes of looking like a retard while looking at two blurry pics. My question now after getting perfect deburry sight is can you gt rid of the two unfocused pics on either side of the 3D one or am I tripping when I see 3 pics?

File: dmmmg_0788_0015.jpg (386KB, 1100x1500px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 1100x1500px

Requesting

I'll make a lot of these in late 2018.

>>4375134
Times sure are tough.

File: 1460084911515.jpg (339KB, 1700x1200px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 1700x1200px

>>4374962
So to view it unblurry your eyes are doing two things. Borrowing the terminology from >>4348087, you change the focus point as one action.

Simultaneously you will want to focus your eyes one the background without moving the focus point.

To practice this portion more easily, try holding your finger or a pencil in front of you and focusing there, then practice focusing your eyes differently, the pencil should become noticeably blurry.

File: wafwafstyle_legit.gif (2MB, 1380x862px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1380x862px

>>4366696
>>4371544
I tried...

>>4366895
>Any sages here who have perfected the art of stereoscopic image viewing?
I'm using this shit as a fun trick with those spot the difference puzzles.
>How long did you have to train?
I couldn't do it for ages and suddenly I was able to do it. Now I can focus to a image in seconds.

I will do a bunch of loli ones. Where I can share them?

>>4381712
Post imgur link here

>>4381713
I've used a different technique than >>4322178, by using topography and shit. I thought the transitions would be pretty nice but it came out a lot of worse than what I've expected. Anyway, it was fun, here you go: http://i.imgur.com/tyX4iJ2.jpg

>>4381931
i think there is too much depth on this image thats why it didn't come out so good

File: __hyuuga_hinata_naruto_drawn_by_tomatto_ma__51bd748bc7f472b83aefe1176ceaabdf.jpg (273KB, 738x1080px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 738x1080px

gimmie some of my girl hinata

>/h/ thread
>so much /e/ content
this is a tragedy

>>4383661
Do you know how complicated making 3D is with 2 people? It's hard enough with 1 person in it.

>>4329167
I always wait for this image when someone starts a topic like this

File: 182345657.jpg (382KB, 3200x1120px) Image search: [Google]

382KB, 3200x1120px

>>4383685
Heh, the last thread had the OP as that comic.

Holy shit, tried to focus them being stoned now. Now I can't focus my eyes back. [spoiler]HALP[/spoiler]

>>4383745
kYS yourself degenerate.

File: Mt.Lady.png (863KB, 1746x1094px) Image search: [Google]

863KB, 1746x1094px

Alright, my first attempt at making one. Hope you guys enjoy it.

File: aaaa.png (682KB, 846x638px) Image search: [Google]

682KB, 846x638px

>>4356166
that's true, portrait pictures are way easier to view than landscape, it means you don't have to cross your eyes as much and the result is a bigger picture overall.

I really wanna try and get into that blender stuff, but wouldnt even know where to start.

I'm sure everyone would appreciate more oc.

pic related is something i did in photoshop, it took quite a while to figure it out, i just cut out as much as I could, and had both sides open in liquify.

I'm sure theres an easier way to do it though.

>>4384299
surprisingly good for a first try, did you do it in photoshop?

>>4384336
>I really wanna try and get into that blender stuff, but wouldnt even know where to start.
Do you have any specific idea on how that work ? (I'm the one who posted the animated ones and the BTS who goes with those)

>>4384363
Thank you. I see a mistake i made but oh well. I used Gimp.

File: darkhairgirl1.jpg (378KB, 2048x900px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 2048x900px

>>4384299

>>4384585
Good work for a first few tries, could use some cleanup around hair ect. The face seems to be flat with the head, so it's more of a "cutout" 3d than looking realish.

>>4383668
then post them in /e/ nigga, it is not my problem

>>4384585
>>4384616
It's actually the case : Using the "extract grain" method, we can see it's actually undeformed layers just moved. Nice try though.

>>4377108
No comment about this one ? I heard that doing a stereoscopic conversion from an animated gif is nearly impossible.

>no animated stereoscopic breast expansion

>>4385412
You know what to do...

>>4384790
>I heard that doing a stereoscopic conversion from an animated gif is nearly impossible.
>nearly impossible
Only with non-fixed perspective or complex backgrounds. Just time consuming otherwise.

>>4366895
I'm not a "sage" but I just started doing this 30 minutes ago and I can get a clear picture. It's not that hard.

>>4384727
>Not my problem
>Is bitching about it

File: 1403632915854.jpg (1MB, 2380x892px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2380x892px

>>4386048

File: KEK4gIj.webm (2MB, 600x900px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 600x900px

>>4356283
/r/ing http://imgur.com/KEK4gIj

File: 888888888888.gif (1MB, 1190x892px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1190x892px

>>4386052

FAIL??? hahaha

Goddammit guys, you've ruined regular porn for me, and not just because my eyes are fucked up now. I hope there's a decent amount of this stuff out there

>>4386125
Don't request images that are against the rules.

Well, as a kid I was always crossing my eyes and fucking with the focus, I knew this type of shit existed but never gave it any thought. That was actually pretty damn cool. Shiiiiiit.

>>4341295
What you are achieving is amazing. I love your small looping animations.. they are perfect.
Can you please (!!!) Try to find a way to render them to 180 degrees VR 3D mode?

I have looked at crossed eye porn since 10 years. Last week I bought myself an VR Shinecon 2 Headset for my Xiaomi Redmi note 3 and it's amazing. I love 3D but looking at it with head tracking is so much better than crossing your eyes.
You could make the scene human scale!

>>4386685
Calm your nipples.

>>4386052
Needs a bit more work on the hair, breasts, and necklace.

The hand is the most markedly 3d.

>>4386805
it's not mine. it was from a thread a while back

File: pokegirl_VR_equirectangular.webm (1MB, 1440x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x720px

>>4386685
I tried... here's the problems :
1 - I don't have a good mobile phone to test it (I talk about cardboard VR thing)
2 - Since it's based on a picture, you always have cropped part
3 - Was lazy... did the missing parts (ground + background) really quickly

>>4389020
Nice, thank you very much.
So the projection worked flawlessly. Watching with head tracking in VR worked. With 180 and you also chose the correct projection.

If you like stereoscopic images and even create them yourself you should buy yourself a cheap cardboard, really.

To your scene. She was huge. And she was close. Way to close.
Please try a camera distance of 7 cm and place the model 1m away. Also scale the model in that way that she is of reasonable size (idk 150 cm)

>>4389089
1 - It's not 180° but 360° actually (I don't know how to create 180° rendering)
2 - The cardboard isn't the problem : I don't have a compatible mobile phone.
3 - It's hard to talk about cm on a virtual thing done using a picture as basis. I used May eyes separation for the camera distance and I moved a little too forward the camera in order to get a better effect. I suppose having a bigger distance between camera could make her a little smaller.

Just tell me if you set up your viewer for a 180° video by "mistake" and I'll try to correct the video afterward.

>>4389420
A Redmi note 3 and a Shinecon 2 costs ~200$ and is every penny worth it.

OK sry I didn't knew it was 360. Now the scale is a lot better. Her legs pussy and stomach are exactly right. Now it is also noticeable that one's head is placed just maybe 20cm from her pussy. Dick has also the right circumstances. About the length one could argue, but we'll that's hentai. It's like 30-40 cm. But that you can't change.
But I noticed one flaw. Her face has no depth and that is extremely irritating. Because of that missing depth I can't say anything about the scaling correctness above her breasts. I think her head is way do far away but I can't really say without a 3d face.

Please move the camera a bit away it's just a little to close.

File: Pokegirl_VR_180degrees.webm (1MB, 2000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2000x1000px

>>4389543
I don't want to touch the model anymore... It was done long ago, that was experimental and making it into VR make it a lot more experimental so... sorry about the face.

I moved the camera away and did a 180° video this time (I just found the feature) with a better resolution.

>>4389683
Resolution is awesome. Nice case study, (but you shouldn't share it yet). Hopefully you will either get VR glasses or give someone other with VR glasses your scenes because the main task is creating the scene. The scaling and camera position is just iterating.
If you would share the scene and maybe explain shortly what rendersettings to use I or someone else could go from here and put a working prototype together which could be shared by you

>>4389760
>(but you shouldn't share it yet)
I shared it because anon wanted a VR version of my stuff. Don't expect improvement on the original model.

>If you would share the scene and maybe explain shortly what rendersettings to use I or someone else could go from here and put a working prototype together which could be shared by you
I won't share the scene because it suck as is (it just work okay for a static view).

About the render settings, just check a regular tutorial on blender 2.78 or newer on how to render a panoramic scene (2.77 and less don't allow panoramic stereoscopic render). In the 2 videos, "Equirectangular" is used for 360° and "Fisheye" for 180°.

And what do you mean by "a working prototype" ?

>>4389786

Working prototype of stereoscopic 180 VR hentai mini-scenes

File: 52989_20160909233327_0.png (803KB, 700x1400px) Image search: [Google]

803KB, 700x1400px

>>4322154
Is there an archive of these images? Also request?

>>4322170
so cool. I almost feel like I can hold her in my hand.

>>4324926
this one is great

>>4389829
Too much work for that. I only did the pokegirl conversion because it's the easiest one to do. All the other animations have cropped part and requires to much work in order to be "converted" into 180/360° scenery.

>>4389683
Hi again. So i was trying to do a 180 stereoscopic. How did you do that? What Projection is used?

File: blenderRenderStereoPanoramic.png (67KB, 318x742px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 318x742px

>>4390871
If you talk about the render/camera settings, here it is.

>>4383265
Fucking thank you, someone with true taste emerges

>>4322154
yo i got a shitty 20$ cardboard VR thingy for my birthday, how do i utilize it?

>>4392692
Just Read The Instructions.

>>4392696
but i mean specfically for porn, is there a good app to view this thread for example? other porn apps?

so I tried browing this thread on cardboard with mimi, it mostly works, the big problem is that basically, the 3d effects are reversed, things that should extend outwards extend inwards, and vice versa, I guess it's because it makes you do the opposite of crossing your eyes(lose focus).

>>4393184
Well that's what close to your face VR does, see if you can mirror the thread or just the images.

File: 1473556817835.jpg (3KB, 125x125px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 125x125px

Fuck I literally can't do this.
What is "cross-eye"ing anyway?

File: 4200ad193c80f6961a31823144b424ff.jpg (9KB, 248x233px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 248x233px

>>4334463
>support custom devices

I built my own headset for $110 and use it for Play Club, Custom Maid and Waifu Sex Sim through Steam VR, games see it as a Vive.
Even does roomscale with a Kinect I had lying around, in the middle of programming knock off Vive Controllers right now

Git gud

>>4393272
Missing an eye or something?

Cross eyeing is when the point that both of your eyes lock onto is moved in front of an image in order to see it in 3d. Parallel is when that point is behind the image.

File: millia foot.png (3MB, 1500x2118px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1500x2118px

Still doing requests? this would be interesting I think

>>4393272
Hold one finger up at arms length in front of you. Now bring your finger closer to your nose, until it's less than 6 inches away. That's cross eyed.

Another important factor is to zoom out/in on the images, until you can comfortably push the two images together into one by going cross eyed. It should look like one clear 3d image in the middle with a blurry one on either side. Once I get the images together my eyes lock on to it and it's easy to look at.

you fags these pictures never work, the images are always spaced a bit to far apart, not a single 3d image.

>>4324956
Came so fucking hard, thx m8

>>4398017
use zoom idiot

I'm getting a Vive soon, is there an application that opens these or is it just any regular old image viewer?

Bump, I need more of this

>>4366895
Well when I was a kid I had those "Magic Eye" books that revealed a hidden image if you looked at it using this method. it took me maybe 10 minutes to get it the first time, then another hour or so to have it down effortlessly. So 15 years later when stereostopic porn starts showing up on the internet it was pretty easy to get into. At this point I'm only limited by how fast my eye muscles can snap into position, so now I'm waiting for science to give me Batou eyes.

Re-bumping

>>4400487
Little too late to bump a thread that's over 300 replies.